A spongy nickel-organic CO2 reduction photocatalyst for nearly 100% selective CO production

+ See all authors and affiliations

Science Advances  28 Jul 2017:
Vol. 3, no. 7, e1700921
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1700921


Solar-driven photocatalytic conversion of CO2 into fuels has attracted a lot of interest; however, developing active catalysts that can selectively convert CO2 to fuels with desirable reaction products remains a grand challenge. For instance, complete suppression of the competing H2 evolution during photocatalytic CO2-to-CO conversion has not been achieved before. We design and synthesize a spongy nickel-organic heterogeneous photocatalyst via a photochemical route. The catalyst has a crystalline network architecture with a high concentration of defects. It is highly active in converting CO2 to CO, with a production rate of ~1.6 × 104 μmol hour−1 g−1. No measurable H2 is generated during the reaction, leading to nearly 100% selective CO production over H2 evolution. When the spongy Ni-organic catalyst is enriched with Rh or Ag nanocrystals, the controlled photocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions generate formic acid and acetic acid. Achieving such a spongy nickel-organic photocatalyst is a critical step toward practical production of high-value multicarbon fuels using solar energy.


Rapid fossil fuel consumption induces environmental burden and energy crisis (13). Excessive anthropogenic CO2 emission is a significant concern because of its hastening impact on climate change (46), acidification of ocean (7), crop yield reduction (8), extinction of animal species (9), and damage to human health (10, 11). Removal of excessive CO2 from the atmosphere (12), particularly converting CO2 to fuels using solar energy, is currently a global research endeavor (1315). Discovering novel catalysts that can reduce the stable CO2 molecules and convert them to liquid fuels with high activity and selectivity is essential (13, 14). To date, despite the progress that has been made in investigating the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 (1519), controlling the reaction to yield a specific product among many possible reaction species, including CO, H2, CH4, and formic acid, remains a great challenge (16, 20, 21). Finding photocatalysts that can efficiently convert CO2 to CO and largely suppress other competing photocatalytic reactions, such as H2 evolution, would be a critical step forward toward practical solar-to-fuels conversion for the production of high-value multicarbon fuels (15, 17, 22).

We recently developed a laser-chemical method and synthesized active transition metal hydroxide catalysts with a high concentration of defects for water oxidation (23). Specifically, we used an unfocused infrared laser to initiate the reactions between transition metal ions and triethylene glycol (TEG) and obtained a series of metal hydroxide–TEG composites with a distorted layered structure (23). This disordered structure enhances the accessibility of water molecules to the active sites and enables efficient electrocatalysis of alkaline water oxidation (23). Such a laser-chemical strategy may be applied to the discovery of many other catalysts, for instance, novel nanostructured metal-organic heterogeneous catalysts for CO2 reduction reaction.

When designing catalysts for CO2 reduction, the material’s ability to capture the CO2 molecules is another significant consideration (24). Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with high surface area and tunable pores have been used for gas capture and heterogeneous catalysis (25, 26). Typically, MOFs have highly ordered crystalline structures constructed by coordinating metal ions or clusters with rigid organic linkers, most often the aromatic carboxylic acid molecules (27), such as terephthalic acid (TPA). In light of MOF structure design, we replace part of the rigid linkers (for example, TPA) in traditional MOFs with soft molecules (for example, TEG) by laser, considering the comparable molecular length of TEG to TPA (fig. S1). When the TEG molecules, which lack essential carboxylic groups for the perfect framework construction, are weaved into the metal-TPA framework, their substitution of TPA linkers may frustrate the growth of highly ordered MOF crystals, resulting in disordered and defective metal-organic hybrids for effective CO2 fixation.

Here, we design a model metal-organic CO2 reduction catalyst, with Ni2+ ions as active metal centers, TPA as a rigid linker, TEG as a soft linker, and dimethylformamide (DMF) as a solvent, via laser-induced solution reactions. The as-synthesized catalyst, labeled as Ni(TPA/TEG), has a crystalline network architecture with considerable defects and performs nearly 100% selective gas production (CO over H2 evolution) with a high CO production rate of ~1.6 × 104 μmol hour−1 g−1. Further metal decorations (that is, Rh and Ag) of the Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst lead to controlled photocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions that generate formic acid and acetic acid.


Structure determination of the Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst

As shown in Fig. 1A, the Ni(TPA/TEG) composite forms a disordered spongy network structure, in which Ni, O, and C are uniformly distributed (fig. S2). In comparison, the solution without TEG, Ni(TPA) only, forms large particles (Fig. 1B). A three-dimensional electron tomographic reconstruction of the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) architecture reveals various mesopores in the structure (Fig. 1C and movie S1), which closely resembles the pore features identified from the N2 physisorption measurements (fig. S3). Figure 1D shows a typical transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) composite, where defective lattices with a d-spacing of 1.02 nm are captured. To further interpret the structure of Ni(TPA/TEG) composite, we acquire a scanning nanobeam diffraction data set using an electron beam with a size of ~3 nm, a total beam current of ~5 pA, and an exposure time of 0.5 s, where the electron beam damage to the metal-organic material has been evidently minimized (Fig. 1E). Single-crystalline diffraction patterns along the [100] and [111] orientations of the Ni(TPA/TEG) composite are captured from two different regions of the spongy network (Fig. 1F and movies S2 and S3), showing an orthorhombic structure similar to that of the Ni(TPA) particles (fig. S4). Changes of the diffraction patterns are observed from movies S2 and S3, indicating defects (that is, grain boundaries) in the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst (fig. S5).

Fig. 1 Structure of the laser-chemical tailored spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst.

(A) Scanning TEM (STEM) images and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX) mapping of the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) nanostructure. (B) STEM image of the Ni(TPA/TEG) particles. (C) Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction of a fraction of spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) composite (movie S1). (D) TEM image of the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) nanostructure. The inset high-resolution TEM image displays the defective (020) lattices [d(020) = 1.02 nm] of an orthorhombic crystal. (E) Scanning electron nanodiffraction series taken from the Ni(TPA/TEG) particle by a scanning nanoprobe with an electron beam size of ~3 nm. The probe step size is 10 nm with an exposure time of 0.5 s at each step and a total beam current of ~5 pA. (F) Diffraction patterns showing the [100] and [111] orientations of the orthorhombic Ni(TPA/TEG) composite (movies S2 and S3). The dimensions of the diffraction patterns are 11.9 nm−1 × 11.9 nm−1.

To verify that the soft TEG molecules have been incorporated into the Ni(TPA) framework (Fig. 2A), we compare the structure of laser-synthesized Ni(TPA) and Ni(TPA/TEG) composites in detail. The x-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern (Fig. 2B) shows that the Ni(TPA) composite has an orthorhombic structure where the Ni-TPA units construct the framework (fig. S4). The spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) has a crystal structure similar to that of Ni(TPA), but slight differences exist in the peak positions and widths of the x-ray lines, which may result from the exchange of linkers and solvent molecules in the structure (28). In the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra (Fig. 2C), we can see that both samples have clear bands of ν(COO) (1375 and 1575 cm−1) and ring breathing (815 cm−1) from the TPA linkers. Characteristic bands of δNCO (690 cm−1) and ν(CO) (1685 cm−1) from DMF molecules are found in Ni(TPA), indicating that DMF molecules may reside in the MOF cavities and coordinate with Ni2+ through carbonyl groups (28). Meanwhile, distinct bands of ν(OH) (1065 and 3374 cm−1) related to TEG are found exclusively in Ni(TPA/TEG), and no DMF bands are detected, indicating that TEG molecules exist in Ni(TPA/TEG); DMF molecules that originally occupied the Ni(TPA) framework cavities prefer to leave. The EDX spectrum (Fig. 2D) also shows that no nitrogen (from DMF) can be detected in Ni(TPA/TEG). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves in Fig. 2E, both displaying three stages of mass losses, indicate differences between the two samples. For Ni(TPA), the mass loss measurements of 6, 18, and 50% are from H2O, DMF, and TPA, respectively (28); for Ni(TPA/TEG), the mass losses of 16, 26, and 26% are from H2O, TEG, and TPA, respectively. The large differences in the mass loss of TPA in the two samples (50% versus 26%) indicate that soft TEG molecules have replaced part of the rigid TPA linkers, causing the formation of a spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) network. Because of the varying chemical environment of Ni2+, the Ni2p peaks in the x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra (Fig. 2F) shifted to the right in Ni(TPA/TEG) compared to Ni(TPA).

Fig. 2 Comparison of laser-chemical tailored Ni(TPA/TEG) and Ni(TPA) composites.

(A) Proposed design strategy of the disordered spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) composite by introducing soft Ni-TEG building units into a Ni(TPA) framework through laser-chemical reaction. XRD patterns (B), FTIR spectra (C), EDX spectra (D), TGA curves (E), and XPS spectra (F) of the laser-chemical tailored Ni(TPA/TEG) and Ni(TPA) composites. a.u., arbitrary units.

We also find that it is more effective to use lasers to cross-link the soft TEG and rigid TPA molecules together with the Ni2+ centers than to use a traditional heating process (see the Supplementary Materials). Laser irradiation appears to produce Ni-TEG building units that are indispensable for the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) network construction (Fig. 2A). Because of the soft character of TEG molecules, various inhomogeneous configurations of Ni-TEG units can be generated. Mismatches between the soft Ni-TEG units and the rigid Ni-TPA units may introduce considerable defects, leading to the formation of disordered spongy Ni(TPA/TEG).

Evaluation of the photocatalytic activity for CO production

We apply the as-synthesized Ni-organic composites for visible light–driven photocatalytic CO2 reduction in a solvent mixture of acetonitrile/water [considering the high solubility of CO2 in acetonitrile (29)] under mild reaction conditions (20°C and 400 torr of CO2), with triethanolamine (TEOA) as a sacrificial reducing agent and Ru(bpy)3Cl2·H2O as a photosensitizer (18, 30). Five samples (figs. S6 to S8), that is, Ni(TPA) (L), Ni(TPA) (H), Ni(TPA/TEG) (L), Ni(TPA/TEG) (H), and Ni(TEG) (L), synthesized by both laser irradiation (L) and traditional heating (H), are examined. Figure 3A shows the CO evolutions from these five Ni-organic catalysts in a 6-hour photocatalytic reaction. The spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) (L) composite shows the highest activity, and the amount of CO is 95.2 μmol after a 2-hour reaction, giving a CO production rate of 15,866 μmol hour−1 g−1, which is several times higher than that from other samples. The total amount of CO produced on the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst in 6 hours reaches 136.9 μmol (Fig. 3A), giving a turnover number of 11.5 for the 6-hour reaction (table S1). The CO production rate is also superior compared with many other reported heterogeneous CO evolution photocatalysts to the best our knowledge (17), such as the Co3O4 platelets with [Ru(bpy)3]Cl2 as a photosensitizer (3523 μmol hour−1 g−1) (18), the sensitized TiO2 particles with enzyme as a cocatalyst (300 μmol hour−1 g−1) (31), and the sensitized BaLa4Ti4O15 particles with Ag as a cocatalyst (22 μmol hour−1 g−1) (16). Note that the soluble homogeneous metal complex catalysts, which have also been investigated for controlled CO2 reduction (3234), are not categorized here for comparison.

Fig. 3 Conversion of CO2 to CO by photocatalysis.

(A) CO evolution on five Ni-based catalysts with different combinations of TPA, TEG, and DMF. The composites synthesized by laser-chemical approach are labeled with “L”; the ones synthesized by traditional heating method are marked with “H.” (B) CO production on different amounts of the Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst. (C) Average yield of CO in the first 2 hours for five recycling tests. (D) MS of 12CO (blue lines) and 13CO (red lines) produced on the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst by using 12CO2 and 13CO2 as gas sources, respectively. m/z, mass/charge ratio. (E) Comparison of CO evolution on five laser-synthesized M(TPA/TEG) (M = Ni, Co, Cu) catalysts. (F) Comparison of H2 evolution on the five M(TPA/TEG) catalysts.

By testing the 2-hour yield of CO on different amounts of the Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst, we obtain a roughly linear relationship between the amount of evolved CO and the amount of the catalyst (Fig. 3B). However, kinetically, we found that the CO production rate actually decreases with the increase in the amount of the catalyst (fig. S9), where 1.0 mg of the Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst gives a CO production rate of ~26,620 μmol hour−1 g−1 in the same solution, indicating that more electrons generated from the photosensitizer molecules could have been transferred to the catalytic active sites. We have also tested the reusability of the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst upon each 2-hour photocatalysis, where the catalyst has kept its activity and selectivity after recycling (Fig. 3C). It also exhibits excellent structural stability, and no obvious structural change is found after 24 hours of photocatalysis (fig. S10). To confirm the origin of the as-produced CO, we use isotopic 13CO2 as feedstock gas for the photocatalytic reduction and examine the products by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). A major signal at a mass/charge ratio of 29 on the mass spectrum corresponding to 13CO (Fig. 3D, red lines) appears, which confirms that the as-detected CO originates from the CO2 gas source (fig. S11).

Transition metal ions with switchable electronic states have long been considered promising active sites for diverse photocatalytic or electrocatalytic reactions, such as water splitting (3537), CO oxidation (38), and CO2 reduction (39). Consequently, we use the laser-chemical method to synthesize four additional samples and compare different metal ions, that is, Ni2+, Co2+, and Cu2+ (fig. S12), as active sites for the photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Results show that the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst is still the most active catalyst for CO evolution, and the activity worsens with the incorporation of Co and Cu ions (Fig. 3E). The amount of CO generated on the Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst is almost two times that of the CO generated from Co(TPA/TEG) in a 6-hour photocatalytic reaction. The Cu(TPA/TEG) catalyst barely generates any CO, which is distinctly different from the metal Cu catalyst that has superior activity for CO evolution from the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 (40).

Evaluation of the CO production selectivity

We find that CO (CO2 + H2O + 2e→CO + 2OH) is the only detectable gas product from the photocatalytic CO2 reduction on the TPA-containing Ni-organic catalysts. H2 evolution (2H2O + 2e→H2 + 2OH), usually acting as a major competing reaction in the CO2 reduction system for many transition metal–based catalysts (18, 20), has been completely suppressed (table S1). Thus, a near 100% selectivity of CO production (over H2 evolution) is achieved. Note that no other potential competing gas products, such as CH4 and C2H4 (17), have been detected in our experiments either.

For comparison, we have detected considerable amounts of H2 from other laser-synthesized M(TPA/TEG) (M = Ni, Co, Cu) catalysts (Fig. 3, E and F, and fig. S13), and CO selectivity values of 96, 70, 78.2, and 4.8% were measured for NiCo(TPA/TEG), Co(TPA/TEG), NiCoCu(TPA/TEG), and Cu(TPA/TEG), respectively. We have also detected a fair amount of H2 (25.7 μmol) from the hydroxylated TPA-free Ni(TEG) catalyst in addition to the CO evolution (96.5 μmol) after a 6-hour reaction (fig. S14), which is analogous to the Ni-based hydroxides for practical H2 evolution from the electrocatalysis of water (36).

Tuning the selectivity for liquid fuels production from CO2

Furthermore, considering the potential of noble metal electrodes for CO2 reduction (41, 42), we decorate the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) with noble metal nanocrystals, that is, Rh and Ag, in pursuit of tuning the selectivity of liquid fuels production from the photocatalytic CO2 reduction (15, 21). Figure 4 (A to C) shows the Ag-decorated Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst, where Ag nanocrystals with an average diameter of ~6 nm are well dispersed on the Ni(TPA/TEG). We examine the liquid products after a 6-hour reaction on three catalysts, that is, undecorated Ni(NPA/TEG), Rh-decorated Ni(TPA/TEG), and Ag-decorated Ni(NPA/TEG) (Fig. 4D). For the Ni(NPA/TEG) catalyst without any decoration, we measure formic acid (HCOOH) with a concentration of 29.2 μM and acetic acid (CH3COOH) with a concentration of 72.5 μM in addition to CO. With the decoration of Rh and Ag nanocrystals, the amounts of CO decrease drastically, whereas the amounts of liquid products significantly increase. Formic acid (HCOOH) with a concentration of 313.5 μM is mainly obtained on the Rh-decorated Ni(NPA/TEG) catalyst, and CH3COOH with a concentration of 195.6 μM is the major product for the Ag-decorated Ni(NPA/TEG) catalyst, where the origin of CH3COOH has been confirmed from the flowing CO2 source by MS (fig. S15). Note that CO, formic acid, and acetic acid reflect the overall product distribution of the photocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction; no other liquid products, such as methanol, ethanol, or propanol, are detected in this experiment.

Fig. 4 Generation of liquid products on metal-decorated Ni(TPA/TEG) composites.

Low-magnification (A) and high-resolution (B) TEM images of the Ni(TPA/TEG) composite decorated with Ag nanocrytals. (C) EDX mapping of the as-prepared Ni(TPA/TEG)-Ag composite. (D) Comparison of the amount of the products (CO, HOOH, and CH3COOH) generated from photocatalytic CO2 reduction on Ni(TPA/TEG), Ni(TPA/TEG)-Rh, and Ni(TPA/TEG)-Ag catalysts.

Enhanced production of liquid fuels from photocatalytic reduction of CO

By assuming that the evolved CO may be further consumed for the production of acids, we also conduct control experiments using CO, instead of CO2, as the gas feedstock for the photocatalytic reduction reaction. As a result, largely enhanced yields of acids are obtained. For instance, the amount of HCOOH evolved from the CO reduction is 24 times higher than that from the CO2 reduction on the Ni(NPA/TEG) catalyst (Fig. 5A), and the amount of CH3COOH produced from the CO reduction reaction for the Ag/Rh-decorated Ni(NPA/TEG) catalyst exhibits a sixfold increase over the results from the CO2 reduction reaction (Fig. 5B and fig. S16). Besides the increase in acid production, another important C2 product, that is, ethanol [with a concentration of 270.6 μM for Ni(NPA/TEG)-Rh and 262.2 μM for Ni(NPA/TEG)-Ag], has also emerged from the 6-hour photocatalytic CO reduction reaction.

Fig. 5 Comparison of the liquid products generated from photocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions (CO2RR) and CO reduction reactions (CORR) on two catalysts.

(A) Ni(TPA/TEG). (B) Ni(TPA/TEG)-Ag.

Possible mechanisms for the photocatalytic reduction reactions of CO2 or CO

On the basis of the abovementioned results, we propose the following mechanism for the photocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions on the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst (Fig. 6). Upon visible light irradiation, the photosensitizer [Ru(bpy)3]2+ is excited and then reductively quenched by the TEOA sacrificial electron donor (18, 30, 43), which gives rise to the reduced species of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ (Fig. 6A). Subsequently, the reduced species of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ could transfer an electron to the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst, which then participates in reducing the CO2 molecules fixed on the catalyst (Fig. 6B). In the 2-hour yield tests of CO production in the solution with different amounts of Ni(TPA/TEG), we have found that the CO production rate decreases with the increase in the amount of catalyst (fig. S9), indicating that the electron transfer from [Ru(bpy)3]2+ to the catalyst could be a rate-determining step for the CO2 reduction reaction, where a diffusion-limited event may have occurred in this heterogeneous catalytic system (44).

Fig. 6 Proposed mechanisms for the photocatalytic conversion of CO2 to CO and of CO to other liquid products.

(A) Visible light reduction of the photosensitizer [Ru(bpy)3]2+, which transfers an electron to the Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst to convert CO2 to CO (B) and to Ni(TPA/TEG)-(Ag/Rh) catalysts for the generation of HCOOH, CH3COOH, and CH3CH2OH from further reduction of CO (C). The STEM image in (C) is the Ag-decorated Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst (the original STEM image is shown in fig. S15). (D) Possible conversion pathways leading to the formation of HCOOH, CH3COOH, and CH3CH2OH via proton-coupled one-, four-, and eight-electron steps, respectively.

For the selective generation of CO from CO2, we propose the formation of a basic intermediate (45) [that is, CO2 radical anion (CO2·)] in the initial reaction step (CO2 + e→CO2·), which acts as a Brønsted base and reacts easily with H2O to form CO (CO2· + H2O + e→CO + 2OH). On the other hand, in our proton-deficient photocatalytic reaction medium (pH 8), water (the proton donor) could provide another nonbasic intermediate, H· (H2O + e→H· + OH), before the H2 evolution (H2O + H· + e→H2 + OH) (46). For the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst, it is likely that the Ni-TPA coordination units are unfavorable for the binding of H· on the active sites, limiting the proton transfer and the formation of H2. In addition, the flexible Ni-TEG units, with superior structural resistance to the aqueous environment (23), enable the disordered spongy network construction, where the open and defective structure provides more accessible Ni2+ active sites to capture and stabilize the CO2· intermediates, leading to the efficient production of CO.

Subsequently, the evolved CO can be further reduced to liquid fuels through proton-coupled multielectron reaction processes (Fig. 6C and fig. S17). Figure 6D shows the proposed conversion pathways leading to the formation of HCOOH, CH3COOH, and CH3CH2OH via proton-coupled one-, four-, and eight-electron steps, respectively, in the electrolyte with a pH value of ~8. For the formation of HCOOH, we propose the following reactionsEmbedded Image(1)Embedded Image(2)Embedded Image(3)where *CO is quickly protonated to *CHO and then hydroxylated to HCOOH. In the pathway of CH3COOH formation, *CO is continuously hydrated to *CHO→*CHOH→*CH2OH→*CH3OH, which bonds with the adsorbed *CO to form CH3COOH. As to the formation of CH3CH2OH, the dehydroxylation of the as-formed *CHO could be a critical rate-limiting step to produce *C that can be further protonated to *CH→*CH2→*CH3 (47), and the C–C coupling between *CH3 and multiprotonated *CO (that is, CH2OH) could lead to the formation of CH3CH2OH (48).

To further tune the proposed reactions, we performed the CO reduction reaction on the Ni(TPA/TEG)-Ag in the electrolyte with a pH value of ~13 (fig. S18). We found that CH3OH (184.09 μM), CH3CH2OH (149.39 μM), HCOOH (438.98 μM), and CH3COOH (276.99 μM) are produced at pH 13 in 6 hours, which is distinct from the liquid products generated at pH 8, that is, CH3OH (0 μM), CH3CH2OH (262.19 μM), HCOOH (263.58 μM), and CH3COOH (1178.04 μM). At pH 13, the hydroxyl ions (OH) are commonly available for the hydroxylation of *CHO, which favors the formation of HCOOH (fig. S18). On the contrary, the enhanced hydroxylation of *CHO may suppress the kinetics of the multiprotonation of *CO and the dehydroxylation of *CHO (Fig. 6D), resulting in a lower amount of CH3COOH and CH3CH2OH at pH 13. The appearance of CH3OH may suggest a weak C–C coupling between *CH3OH and *CO at pH 13 (leading to CH3COOH at pH 8), which should be considered for the future CO2/CO reduction catalyst design (49).

In summary, we have demonstrated a photochemical strategy for the design of novel nanostructured metal-organic materials, where the rigid TPA and soft TEG molecules are successfully cross-linked together with the Ni2+ centers. A spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) hybrid structure with a considerably high concentration of defects has been achieved. We found that the Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst is remarkably active for CO production (with a production rate of 15,866 μmol hour−1 g−1) from the heterogeneous photocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction, during which no other measurable competing gases such as H2 or CH4 are generated, thus giving a near 100% CO selectivity over other gases. When the spongy Ni-organic catalyst is enriched with Rh or Ag nanocrystals, formic acid and acetic acid can be produced selectively from the photocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions. We propose to use the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst in a “tandem catalyst” system to convert CO2 into high-value liquid fuels using visible light, where the selectively CO2-turned CO can be directly used as an intermediate gas reactant for the generation of liquid fuels, such as ethanol and acetic acid (fig. S19). More advanced metal-organic heterogeneous photocatalysts with improved CO2 fixation and light-harvesting capabilities are expected to be fabricated using the photochemical strategy for efficient solar-to-fuels conversion.


Laser-chemical synthesis of metal-organic photocatalysts

All chemicals including nickel nitrate (99.99%), cobalt nitrate (99%), copper nitrate trihydrate (99%), ethanol (99.5%), DMF, TPA, and TEG were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. The deionized water was produced by the Milli-Q Integral water purification system. A Continuum Surelite III nanosecond pulsed laser was used as a power source, and the following were the typical parameters of operation: wavelength, 1064 nm; frequency, 10 Hz; pulse width, 7 to 8 ns; beam diameter, 0.9 cm; and 700 mJ per pulse. TEG solutions (1 ml) of 1.5 M transition metal nitrates were added into 5 ml of DMF solution of 0.5 M TPA; the mixed solutions were stirred for 30 min before laser irradiation. For the syntheses of NiCo- and NiCoCu-organic frameworks, molar ratios of Ni/Co (1:1) and Ni/Co/Cu (1:1:1) were used, respectively. Typically, 3-hour laser irradiation was required for a 6-ml mixed precursor solution to complete the reaction. For the syntheses by heating method, the same precursor solutions in glass vials were heated at 110°C in an oven for 48 hours. Precipitates produced after laser irradiations or heating were rinsed with acetone/ethanol, centrifuged at 9000 rpm for three times, and then dried in air at 60°C to obtain powders.

Photocatalysis measurement of CO2 reduction reactions

The visible light–driven photocatalytic CO2 reduction was conducted in a closed gas circulation and evacuation system fitted with a top window Pyrex cell. A circulating cooling water system was used to maintain the reactor at around 20°C. In a typical reaction, 3 mg of catalyst (for each test), 2.5 mmol of Ru(bpy)3Cl2·6H2O, and 2 ml of TEOA were added to 10 ml of acetonitrile/H2O solvent mixture (CH3CN/H2O = 8:2). The pH value of the solution was ~8, which was tuned to 13 by 1 M NaOH aqueous solution for control experiment. The light source was a 300-W Xe lamp with a long-pass cutoff filter (λ > 420 nm). Before light irradiation, the reaction system was evacuated and refilled with high-purity CO2 (99.995%; SOXAL) several times to remove air inside and finally filled with CO2 gas to reach a pressure of 400 torr. The evolved gas was detected by online GC (Agilent 7890A) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector and a flame ionization detector (FID) at different times of the photoreaction. To evaluate catalyst reusability, 15 mg of the catalyst was applied for photocatalysis and recycled by centrifugation after a 2-hour reaction, and then mixed with 8 ml of CH3CN, 2 ml of H2O, 2 ml of TEOA, and 18 mg of Ru(bpy)3Cl2·6H2O for the next run. The solution products in the liquid phase were analyzed separately at the end of the photoreaction. Alcohols in the liquid phase were analyzed by Agilent 7890A GC with an FID, a DB-WAX column, and helium as the carrier gas. Carboxylic acids in the liquid phase were analyzed using an Agilent 1260 high-performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) with a PL Hi-Plex H column and variable wavelength detector (VWD) (210 nm). [Ru(bpy)3]Cl2·6H2O (99.95%) and TEOA (≥99.0%) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The acetonitrile (HPLC-grade) was obtained from Merck.

The 13CO2 isotope tracer experiment was performed under similar photocatalytic reaction conditions. The reactor containing 3 mg of the catalyst, 2.5 mmol of Ru(bpy)3Cl2·6H2O, 2 ml of TEOA, and 10 ml of the CH3CN-H2O mixture solution (CH3CN/H2O = 8:2) was first evacuated to ensure air removal and then refilled with 13CO2 gas (99 atomic % 13C; Aldrich) to reach a pressure of 400 torr. After 4 hours of irradiation, 200 μl of gas products was withdrawn using a gas-tight syringe and then injected into a GC-MS (Agilent, GC Model 6890N/MS Model 5973) with a molecular sieve 5 Å column for analysis. The carboxylic acid analysis was carried out separately by using a Thermo Finnigan LCQ MS system.


Supplementary material for this article is available at

Materials characterizations

Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction of the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) network

Comparison of the samples synthesized by laser-chemical route and traditional heating method

Control experiments to confirm the origin of the evolved CO

fig. S1. Structure of the selected rigid TPA linkers and soft TEG linkers for the laser synthesis of the nickel-organic photocatalyst.

fig. S2. Morphology and composition of the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) composite.

fig. S3. Nitrogen physisorption measurements of the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst.

fig. S4. A comparison between the measured and simulated powder XRD patterns of the crystalline Ni(TPA) framework.

fig. S5. Electron diffraction of the Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst.

fig. S6. STEM images show the morphologies of five nickel-organic composites synthesized either by the laser-chemical approach (L) or the conventional heating method (H).

fig. S7. Comparison of the structure of Ni(TPA/TEG) and Ni(TPA) composites synthesized by both laser-chemical (L) and heating (H) methods.

fig. S8. Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area of five as-synthesized nickel-organic composites, including Ni(TPA/TEG) (L), Ni(TEG) (L), Ni(TPA)-DMF (L), Ni(TPA)-TEG (H), and Ni(TPA)-DMF (H).

fig. S9. CO production rate on different amounts of the Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst.

fig. S10. Powder XRD patterns of the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst before and after 24-hour photocatalytic reactions.

fig. S11. Controlled photocatalysis experiments by applying the Ni(TPA/TEG) (L) catalyst in either CO2 or He gas, and without adding catalyst in CO2.

fig. S12. Comparison of the morphology and structure of the five laser-synthesized M(TPA/TEG) (M = Ni, Co, Cu) catalysts, including Ni(TPA/TEG), NiCo(TPA/TEG), Co(TPA/TEG), NiCoCu(TPA/TEG), and Cu(TPA/TEG).

fig. S13. Comparison of the yield of CO and H2 on five laser-synthesized M(TPA/TEG) (M = Ni, Co, Cu) catalysts after a 6-hour photocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction.

fig. S14. Comparison of the gas products evolved from the laser-synthesized Ni(TPA/TEG) and Ni(TEG) catalysts.

fig. S15. MS of acetic acid (CH3COOH) produced from the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 using the Ni(TPA/TEG)-Ag catalyst.

fig. S16. Comparison of the liquid products generated from photocatalytic CO2RR and CORR on the Ni(TPA/TEG)-Rh catalyst.

fig. S17. STEM image of the Ag-decorated Ni(TPA/TEG) catalyst.

fig. S18. Comparison of the liquid products generated from photocatalytic CO reduction reactions on the Ni(TPA/TEG)-Ag catalyst at pH 8 and 13.

fig. S19. Proposed three-cell tandem photocatalytic CO2 reduction system for liquid fuels production.

table S1. List of other heterogeneous catalysts used for photocatalytic CO2-to-CO conversion.

movie S1. Three-dimensional reconstructed tomography of a fraction of the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) composite.

movie S2. Scanning nanobeam diffraction pattern series showing the [100] orientation of the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) composite.

movie S3. Scanning nanobeam diffraction pattern series taken along the [111] orientation of the spongy Ni(TPA/TEG) composite.

References (5055)

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.


Acknowledgments: We acknowledge C. Gammer for developing the Foundry users’ code for electron scanning diffraction experiments and analysis and Y. Liu at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) for help with FTIR spectroscopy measurements. Funding: We used TEM facilities in the Molecular Foundry at LBNL, which was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under contract #DE-AC02-05CH11231. Electron tomography studies used resources of the Center for Functional Nanomaterials, which is a DOE Office of Science facility, at Brookhaven National Laboratory under contract no. DE-SC0012704. This work was also supported by the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies of the DOE, under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. All materials synthesis was carried out at LBNL and was supported by the DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, under contract no. DE-AC02-05-CH11231 within the Early Career program MSE08 (to H.Z.). Y.X. and R.X. acknowledge financial support from Nanyang Technological University. K.N. and Y.L. were partially supported by the SinBeRise program of BEARS (Berkeley Education Alliance for Research in Singapore) at University of California, Berkeley. Author contributions: K.N. designed and performed the experiments, analyzed the experimental data, and wrote the manuscript. Y.X. and R.X. performed the photocatalysis experiments. H.W. performed the laser-chemical synthesis. H.L.X. performed the three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction. R.Y., F.L., C.T., Y.L., and K.C.B. helped on materials structure analyses. M.M.D., J.A., and M.T.M.K. contributed to the manuscript writing and catalytic mechanism discussions. All work was carried out under the supervision of H.Z. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.
View Abstract

Navigate This Article