Science Advances

Supplementary Materials

This PDF file includes:

  • fig. S1. Map view of the seismicity at the SSGF.
  • fig. S2. Time delay measurements obtained from EN network at the SSGF.
  • fig. S3. Frequency-dependent Rayleigh-wave phase velocity sensitivity.
  • fig. S4. Time-lapse measurements of seismic velocity changes inferred from nine components of NCFs.
  • fig. S5. Stress changes imparted by the 4 April 2010 Mw 7.2 El Mayor–Cucapah earthquake.
  • fig. S6. Stress changes imparted by the 26 August 2012 Mw 5.4 Brawley earthquake.
  • fig. S7. Seismic velocity changes, geodetic line-length change, and precipitation measurements around occurrence times of the 2010 Mw 7.2 El Mayor–Cucapah earthquake and the 2012 Brawley seismic (BS) swarm.
  • fig. S8. Seismic velocity changes, net production, and geodetic line-length change measurements.
  • fig. S9. Time history of velocity changes with the single-station cross-correlation analysis.
  • fig. S10. Long-term velocity change estimate with curve fitting.
  • fig. S11. Long-term velocity change as a function of site elevation.
  • fig. S12. Time-lapse measurements of seismic velocity changes at station RXH with the single-station cross-correlation analysis.
  • fig. S13. Response of hydrothermal vents to stresses.
  • fig. S14. Stress sensitivity for the 2010 Mw 7.2 El Mayor–Cucapah earthquake.
  • fig. S15. Seismic velocity changes, geodetic line-length change, and precipitation measurements around occurrence times of the 30 December 2009 M 5.8 Delta, Baja California, Mexico and the 15 June 2010 M 5.7 Ocotillo, California earthquakes.
  • fig. S16. Seismic velocity changes, geodetic line-length change, and precipitation measurements around occurrence times of the 2009 and 2010 earthquake swarms.
  • fig. S17. Volumetric static stress change and seismicity map.
  • fig. S18. Possible velocity change during the 2005 OB earthquake swarm.
  • fig. S19. The November 2009 earthquake swarm.
  • fig. S20. The December 2010 earthquake swarm.
  • table S1. Parameters of the best-fitting curve to observed seismic velocity changes with Eq. 1 and variance reduction (VR).
  • table S2. PGV from the SCEDC and stress sensitivity estimate for the 4 April 2010 Mw 7.2 El Mayor–Cucapah earthquake.
  • References (78–80)

Download PDF

Files in this Data Supplement: