## Abstract

It is well established that the anomalous Hall effect displayed by a ferromagnet scales with its magnetization. Therefore, an antiferromagnet that has no net magnetization should exhibit no anomalous Hall effect. We show that the noncolinear triangular antiferromagnet Mn_{3}Ge exhibits a large anomalous Hall effect comparable to that of ferromagnetic metals; the magnitude of the anomalous conductivity is ~500 (ohm·cm)^{−1} at 2 K and ~50 (ohm·cm)^{−1} at room temperature. The angular dependence of the anomalous Hall effect measurements confirms that the small residual in-plane magnetic moment has no role in the observed effect except to control the chirality of the spin triangular structure. Our theoretical calculations demonstrate that the large anomalous Hall effect in Mn_{3}Ge originates from a nonvanishing Berry curvature that arises from the chiral spin structure, and that also results in a large spin Hall effect of 1100 (ħ/e) (ohm·cm)^{−1}, comparable to that of platinum. The present results pave the way toward the realization of room temperature antiferromagnetic spintronics and spin Hall effect–based data storage devices.

- Spintronics
- antiferromagnet
- anomalous Hall effect

## INTRODUCTION

In a normal conductor, the Lorentz force gives rise to the Hall effect, wherein the induced Hall voltage varies linearly with the applied magnetic field. Moreover, in a ferromagnetic material, one can realize a large spontaneous Hall effect—termed the anomalous Hall effect (AHE)—that scales with its magnetization (*1*, *2*). Although the detailed origin of the AHE has been puzzling for many years, recent theoretical developments have provided a deeper understanding of the intrinsic contribution of the AHE in ferromagnets in terms of the Berry-phase curvature (*1*, *3*–*6*). The Berry phase is a very useful tool for understanding the evolution of an electron’s wave function in the presence of a driving perturbation, such as an electric field. The electron’s motion may deviate from its usual path, wherein the electron follows a path along the direction of the applied electric field, and may pick up a transverse component of momentum even in the absence of an external magnetic field, leading to a Hall effect. This process can be understood by calculating the Berry curvature, which is an intrinsic property of the occupied electronic states in a given crystal with a certain symmetry, and only takes a nonzero value in systems where time-reversal symmetry is broken (for example, by the application of a magnetic field) or where magnetic moments are present. From symmetry analysis, the Berry curvature vanishes for conventional antiferromagnets with colinear moments, thereby resulting in zero AHE. However, a nonvanishing Berry phase in antiferromagnets with a noncolinear spin arrangement was recently predicted to lead to a large AHE (*7*–*9*). In particular, Chen *et al.* (*7*) have demonstrated theoretically that an anomalous Hall conductivity (AHC) larger than 200 (ohm·cm)^{−1} can be obtained in the noncolinear antiferromagnet Mn_{3}Ir.

The Heusler compound Mn_{3}Ge is known to crystallize in both tetragonal and hexagonal structures, depending on the annealing temperature (*10*, *11*). Hexagonal Mn_{3}Ge exhibits a triangular antiferromagnetic structure with an ordering temperature of ~365 to 400 K (*11*–*14*). As shown in Fig. 1A, the hexagonal unit cell of Mn_{3}Ge consists of two layers of Mn triangles stacked along the *c* axis. In each layer, the Mn atoms form a Kagome lattice, with Ge sitting at the center of a hexagon. Neutron diffraction studies have revealed a noncolinear triangular antiferromagnetic spin arrangement of the Mn spins in which the neighboring moments are aligned in-plane at an angle of 120° (*13*, *14*). These same studies have reported that the spin triangle is free to rotate in an external magnetic field (*13*, *14*). This noncolinear structure arises as a result of the geometrical frustration of the Mn moments that are arranged in a triangular configuration in the *a*-*b* plane. We have performed ab initio calculations of the magnetic ground state of Mn_{3}Ge. The lowest energy spin configuration is shown in Fig. 1B and is consistent with previous calculations (*15*, *16*). In addition to the 120° ordered antiferromagnetic structure, a very small net in-plane moment exists as a result of a small tilting of the Mn moments (*13*).

## RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We have calculated the Berry curvature and AHC in Mn_{3}Ge using the linear-response Kubo formulism (*1*) based on our calculated magnetic structure (Fig. 1B). We find that the AHC exhibits nearly zero values for both *xy* () and *yz* () components and only large values for the *xz* component = 330 (ohm·cm)^{−1}. Here, corresponds to the AHC when current flows along the *j* direction, and thereby results in a Hall voltage along the *i* direction: can be treated as a pseudovector pointing along the *k* direction that is perpendicular to both the *i* direction and the *j* direction. The symmetry of the antiferromagnetic structure of Mn_{3}Ge determines which components of the AHC tensor must be zero. As shown in Fig. 1, the two magnetic layers that compose the primitive unit cell of the antiferromagnetic structure of Mn_{3}Ge can be transformed into each other by a mirror reflection, with respect to the *xz* plane (as indicated in Fig. 1), plus a translation by *c*/2 along the *c* axis. Because of the mirror symmetry, the components of the vanish if they align parallel to the mirror plane. This is the case for and , which are expected to be exactly zero. However, the aforementioned residual net in-plane moment acts as a perturbation of the mirror symmetry. As a consequence, and can pick up nonzero but tiny values. By contrast, the component of perpendicular to the mirror plane (namely, ) is nonzero. We show the calculated values of in the *xz* plane in Fig. 1D. The distribution is highly nonuniform and is characterized by four well-defined peaks (that is, “hot spots”). These peaks correspond to regions in *k* space where there is a small energy gap between the occupied bands and the empty bands: this small gap is a consequence of the spin-orbit coupling within the Mn 3d band.

Moreover, a large AHC [~900 (ohm·cm)^{−1}] has previously been shown theoretically by considering a slightly different spin configuration (*8*). In the latter case, a nonvanishing component of the AHC can be obtained in the *yz* plane. The reason for this difference is straightforward; in the spin configuration shown in Fig. 1B, if the spins parallel to *y* tilt slightly in the *x* direction, a nonzero Berry curvature in the *yz* plane will result. In all of these configurations, the AHE is zero in the *xy* plane if one strictly considers only an in-plane spin structure. We note that other noncolinear spin structures, including a 120° spin structure on a triangular lattice, can also give rise to an AHE (*9*).

Like the AHE, the intrinsic spin Hall effect also originates from the band structure. The strong entanglement between occupied and unoccupied states near the Fermi level should give rise to a large contribution to both anomalous and spin Hall conductivities. Motivated by our large AHC, we have also theoretically analyzed the spin Hall conductivity (SHC), and we predict that a large SHC of 1100 (ħ/e) (ohm·cm)^{−1} can be obtained in Mn_{3}Ge. The theoretical SHC in Mn_{3}Ge is comparable to that of Pt (*17*) and is larger than the SHC recently reported in Mn_{3}Ir, which also exhibits a triangular antiferromagnetic structure (*18*). In the present work, we experimentally show evidence for an AHC in a hexagonal single crystal of Mn_{3}Ge that agrees well with our theoretical predictions of AHC.

To probe the AHE in Mn_{3}Ge, we have carried out detailed Hall effect measurements as a function of magnetic field over temperatures varying from 2 to 400 K. Figure 2A shows the Hall resistivity ρ_{H} versus the magnetic field *H* measured for the current (*I*) along [0001] and (*H*) parallel to [01-10]. ρ_{H} saturates in modest magnetic fields, attaining a large saturation value of 5.1 μohm·cm at 2 K and ~1.8 μohm·cm at 300 K. The Hall conductivity for the same *I* and *H* configurations (which we label configuration I) (σ_{xz}), calculated from σ_{H} = −ρ_{H}/ρ^{2} (where ρ is the normal resistivity), exhibits a large value of ~500 (ohm·cm)^{−1} at 2 K and a modest value of ~50 (ohm·cm)^{−1} at 300 K (Fig. 2B). Because both ρ_{H} and σ_{H} saturate in magnetic fields, these clearly reflect an AHE that is large in magnitude. To study whether the experimental AHE has an anisotropy, as predicted by theory, we measured ρ_{H} with *I* along [01-10] and with *H* parallel to [2-1-10] (σ_{yz}). In this configuration II, ρ_{H} is slightly smaller than configuration I (~4.8 μohm·cm at 2 K and 1.6 μohm·cm at 300 K) (Fig. 2C). Although σ_{H} (σ_{yz}) is reduced at 2 K in configuration II compared to configuration I [to about 150 (ohm·cm)^{−1}], a similar value of σ_{H} = 50 (ohm·cm)^{−1} at 300 K is found for both configuration I and configuration II (Fig. 2D). In both cases, ρ_{H} is negative (positive) for positive (negative) fields. Finally, in a third configuration (configuration III), we apply *I* along [2-1-10] and *H* parallel to [0001]. In this configuration, we observe small values of both ρ_{H} and σ_{H} (σ_{xy}) at all temperatures (Fig. 2, E and F); moreover, the sign of AHE is opposite to that for configurations I and II.

To confirm that the observation of a large AHE in the present system originates from the noncolinear antiferromagnetic spin structure, we have performed magnetization measurements with the field parallel to different crystallographic directions. The temperature dependence of magnetization *M* (*T*) indicates a *T*_{C} of 380 K for the present Mn_{3}Ge single crystal (see the Supplementary Materials), only slightly lower than that reported in the literature. The *M* (*H*) loop measured with the field parallel to [2-1-10] displays a tiny spontaneous magnetization of 0.005 μ_{B}/Mn at 2 K (Fig. 3). The zero field moment is slightly larger (0.006 μ_{B}/Mn at 2 K) when the field is applied parallel to [01-10]. An extremely soft magnetic behavior is found in both cases, with coercive fields (*H*_{C}) of less than 20 Oe. These magnetization values agree well with previous results that show an in-plane magnetic moment of ~0.007 μ_{B}/Mn (*12*). Although the Mn moments are expected to lie only in the *a*-*b* plane, we observe a moment that is an order of magnitude less than 0.0007 μ_{B}/Mn at 2 K for a field parallel to [0001]. This indicates that there could be a very small tilting of the Mn spins toward the *c* axis. The *M* (*H*) loops measured at 300 K for different field orientations are similar to the 2 K data, except that the high-field magnetization strongly decreases for *H* parallel to [0001] (inset to Fig. 3).

From our magnetization data, it is clear that the present Mn_{3}Ge sample has a nearly zero net magnetic moment. Hence, we conclude that the extremely large AHE depicted in Fig. 2 must be related to the noncolinear antiferromagnetic spin structure, as predicted by theory. The observation of a large AHC in the *xz* and *yz* planes, and of a very small effect in the *xy* plane, is also consistent with our theoretical calculations. Although our calculations show a nonzero AHC only in the *xz* plane, this is true for the particular spin configuration considered (see Fig. 1B). By symmetry, the *x* and *y* directions must be symmetry-related so that there will be equal contributions to the measured AHE for the various symmetry-related spin configurations (by rotation by ±120° in Fig. 1B) or the spin configurations can be rotated by the applied field as a result of the small in-plane magnetic moment, as illustrated in Fig. 1D.

It is interesting to compare the magnitude of the present AHE with that exhibited by ferromagnetic Heusler compounds because the hexagonal Mn_{3}Ge structure evolves from the cubic Heusler structure by distortion of the lattice along the (111) direction. For example, the ferromagnetic Heusler compounds Co_{2}MnSi and Co_{2}MnGe, which exhibit a net magnetic moment of ~5 μ_{B}/Mn (more than two orders of magnitude higher by comparison to the present h-Mn_{3}Ge), display a maximum ρ_{H} of ~4 μohm·cm (*19*). The same study showed that ρ_{H} decreases by two orders of magnitude when the magnetization is reduced to nearly half in Cu_{2}MnAl (*19*). A similar scaling of ρ_{H} with magnetization has also been demonstrated by Zeng *et al.* (*2*) for ferromagnetic Mn_{5}Ge_{3}. Moreover, it has also been well established that the Hall conductivity in many ferromagnetic materials scales with their normal conductivity (*19*–*21*). In the present case, the Hall conductivity measured with the current along different crystallographic directions follows a behavior similar to that of the normal conductivity (see the Supplementary Materials). Similar data for the AHE in the noncolinear antiferromagnet Mn_{3}Sn have been recently published by Nakatsuji *et al.* (*22*). However, Mn_{3}Ge exhibits distinctions in its magnetism, as well as its AHE, in comparison to Mn_{3}Sn. In particular, the maximum AHC in the present system is nearly three times higher than that of Mn_{3}Sn. Moreover, Mn_{3}Ge does not show any secondary transition, such as the cluster glass phase observed at low temperatures in Mn_{3}Sn (*22*).

According to theoretical predictions, the nonvanishing Berry curvature arising from the noncolinear triangular antiferromagnetic structure is responsible for the observed large AHE. In such a scenario, we would expect to observe an AHE without applying any magnetic field. However, the special spin arrangement in both h-Mn_{3}Ge and h-Mn_{3}Sn can lead to the formation of antiferromagnetic domains. Therefore, in zero magnetic field, the direction of the Hall voltage may be different in each antiferromagnetic domain, resulting in a vanishing AHC. The presence of a weak in-plane ferromagnetic moment ensures that a small magnetic field in one direction within the *a*-*b* plane is sufficient to eliminate the domains, and hence allows the establishment of a large AHE. In particular, neutron diffraction measurements have established that an applied magnetic field does not substantially affect the 120° triangular antiferromagnetic spin structure, but the magnetic field does result in a rotation of the spin triangle opposite to the in-plane field component (*14*, *23*). Therefore, switching the direction of an in-plane field from positive to negative results in the switching of the direction of the staggered moment in the triangular spin structure, and consequently causes a change in the sign of the anomalous Hall voltage. The small variation of the anomalous Hall signal at high fields likely originates from the normal component of the Hall signal or from the magnetic susceptibility of the magnetic structure.

To establish that the presence of the weak in-plane ferromagnetism in Mn_{3}Ge has virtually no role in the observed AHE, we have carried out angular-dependent measurements of the AHE for various field and current configurations. In configuration I shown in Fig. 4A, the current was applied along *z* and the voltage was measured in the *xz* plane, resulting in *V*_{x}. In this configuration, the initial field direction for θ = 0 is along *y*. The field was then rotated in the *y*-*z* plane. Under these conditions, the AHC (σ_{yz}) remains constant up to θ = 90°, where it suddenly changes sign. A similar sign change occurs again at θ = 270°. This behavior can be explained as follows: with increasing θ, although the in-plane magnetic field decreases, a small component of the field lies parallel to the *a*-*b* plane up to θ = 90°. This small in-plane field maintains the chirality of the triangular spin structure in a single direction. At angles greater than 90°, the in-plane field changes its direction, resulting in a change in the chirality of the spin structure, which produces the sign change in the AHE. A similar phenomenon happens at 270° (Fig. 4B). In configuration II, we apply the current along *y* with the voltage measured in the *yz* plane (*V*_{z}), and the field is rotated in the *x*-*z* plane. In this case, *H* is always perpendicular to *I*. The angular dependence of the AHC (σ_{yz}) follows the same behavior as that of configuration I. In both cases, a large and constant AHC was obtained when at least a small field parallel to the in-plane spin structure was present. We now show that the AHC measured in the *xy* plane (σ_{xy}) always remains nearly zero even when there is a nonzero field component parallel to the plane of the triangular spin structure. In configuration III, *V*_{y} was measured in the *xy* plane with *I* along *x* (Fig. 4C). The field was rotated in the *z*-*y* plane. In this configuration, a component of the magnetic field always remains parallel to the *a*-*b* plane, except for θ = 0 and 180°. However, σ_{xy} remains nearly zero regardless of the field direction. A small nonvanishing value of σ_{xy} may appear from a slight canting of the spins along the *z* (*c*) direction. The feasibility of a nonplanar structure in Mn_{3}Ge has also been discussed in our previous theoretical work (*8*). From these angle-dependent measurements, it can be readily concluded that the small residual in-plane ferromagnetic component, as well as the applied magnetic field, plays no role in the observed large AHE in Mn_{3}Ge.

In summary, we have experimentally demonstrated that the noncolinear antiferromagnet Mn_{3}Ge exhibits a large AHE, even at room temperature. The origin of this exotic effect is discussed in terms of a nonvanishing Berry curvature in momentum space. Antiferromagnets are of significant interest for spintronic applications (*24*–*26*) because, in contrast to ferromagnets, they do not produce any undesirable dipole fields. Therefore, the present antiferromagnetic material with a large AHE, which is easily controlled by the current, can be exploited for spintronics, without the drawbacks of ferromagnets. Finally, our theoretical finding of a large spin Hall effect in Mn_{3}Ge will motivate further studies to explore other phenomena derived from the Berry-phase curvature in antiferromagnets.

During the writing of the present manuscript, we became aware of a similar study of a large AHE in Mn_{3}Sn conducted by Nakatsuji *et al.* (*22*). We have compared the present findings for Mn_{3}Ge with those for Mn_{3}Sn in the main text.

## MATERIALS AND METHODS

For the single-crystal growth, stoichiometric quantities of pure elements were weighed and premelted in an alumina crucible in an induction furnace. The ingot was ground and put in an alumina crucible, which was sealed in a quartz ampule. The single crystal was grown using the Bridgman-Stockbarger technique. The growth temperature was controlled at the bottom of the ampule. The material was heated up to 980°C, remained there for 1 hour to ensure homogeneity of the melt, and was cooled down slowly to 740°C. The sample was annealed at 740°C for 15 hours and then quenched to room temperature in argon gas. The sample was cut into five slices perpendicular to the growth direction. The dimensions of each slice were approximately 6 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick. Single-crystal x-ray diffraction was carried out on a Bruker D8 VENTURE x-ray diffractometer using Mo-K radiation and a bent graphite monochromator. The magnetization measurements were carried out on a vibrating sample magnetometer (MPMS 3, Quantum Design). The transport measurements were performed with low-frequency alternating current (ACT option, PPMS 9, Quantum Design). Our ab initio density functional theory calculations were performed using the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package with projected augmented wave potential (*27*). The exchange-correlation energy was considered at the generalized gradient approximation level (*28*). Further details of the calculations are given in the Supplementary Materials.

## SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary material for this article is available at http://advances.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2/4/e1501870/DC1

fig. S1. Temperature dependence of magnetization.

fig. S2. Conductivity with temperature.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is **not** for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.

## REFERENCES AND NOTES

**Acknowledgments:**We thank C. Geibel for helpful discussions and use of the Bridgman furnace.

**Funding:**This work was financially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (project numbers TP 1.2-A and 2.3-A of Research Unit FOR 1464 ASPIMATT) and by the European Research Council Advanced Grant (grant 291472) “Idea Heusler.”

**Author contributions:**A.K.N. performed the transport and magnetic measurements with the help of C.S., N.K., and W.S. The theoretical calculations were carried out by Y.S., B.Y., and J. Kübler. J.E.F. synthesized the single crystal. J.E.F., A.C.K., and J. Karel performed the structural characterization. A.K.N. and S.S.P.P. wrote the manuscript, with substantial contributions from all authors. C.F. and S.S.P.P. inspired and jointly supervised the project.

**Competing interests:**The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

**Data and materials availability:**All data used to obtain the conclusions in this paper are presented in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Other data may be requested from the authors. Please direct all inquiries to A.K.N. (nayak{at}cpfs.mpg.de) and S.S.P.P. (stuart.parkin{at}mpi-halle.mpg.de).

- Copyright © 2016, The Authors