Research ArticleBIOPHYSICS

A molecular rack and pinion actuates a cell-surface adhesin and enables bacterial gliding motility

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science Advances  04 Mar 2020:
Vol. 6, no. 10, eaay6616
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aay6616


The gliding bacterium Flavobacterium johnsoniae is known to have an adhesin, SprB, that moves along the cell surface on a spiral track. Following viscous shear, cells can be tethered by the addition of an anti-SprB antibody, causing spinning at 3 Hz. Labeling the type 9 secretion system (T9SS) with a YFP fusion of GldL showed a yellow fluorescent spot near the rotation axis, indicating that the motor driving the motion is associated with the T9SS. The distance between the rotation axis and the track (90 nm) was determined after adding a Cy3 label for SprB. A rotary motor spinning a pinion of radius 90 nm at 3 Hz would cause a spot on its periphery to move at 1.5 μm/s, the gliding speed. We suggest the pinion drives a flexible tread that carries SprB along a track fixed to the cell surface. Cells glide when this adhesin adheres to the solid substratum.


Rod-shaped gliding bacteria move in a manner similar to a self-propelled screw; i.e., they roll along their long axis as they move forward on an external surface (1, 2). Bacteria related to Flavobacterium johnsoniae, which is the fastest of all known gliders, are present in diverse environments such as the human oral microbiome (3), fish scales (4), water bodies (5), and plant rhizosphere (6), where they glide over and colonize their preferred surfaces. How the molecular players form the machinery that actuates this motion is not clearly understood. F. johnsoniae is now the organism of choice for studies of this process because rates of movement are high, and much of the genetics is known (7, 8). A mobile cell-surface adhesin, SprB, has been identified, which plays a central role in gliding (9, 10). Tracking of SprB in three-dimensional space has revealed the presence of a spiral cell-surface track on which SprB moves (1). Cells subjected to viscous shear stop gliding, but they can be tethered to an external surface using anti-SprB antibody. Tethered cells pinwheel around a fixed axis, suggesting that a rotary motor that generates high torque is a part of the gliding machinery (11).

Bacterial motility machines have external components and are thus coupled with protein secretion systems. The flagellar motor is associated with the type 3 secretion system (12, 13), and the type 4 pili motor is associated with the type 2 secretion system (1416). In Flavobacterium, the type 9 secretion system (T9SS) is required for the secretion of SprB, and cells lacking the T9SS are nonmotile (17). T9SS spans the inner and outer membranes and the periplasmic region. The T9SS has an outer-membrane barrel made up of a protein SprA. It is one of the largest transmembrane β barrels known in biology (18). Structural data suggest that in the periplasmic region, the T9SS forms at least one ring-shaped structure that contains GldK, while GldM spans the periplasmic region (19, 20). GldL is a cytoplasmic membrane protein and is one of the core T9SS proteins (17). Figures that summarize the current proposed macromolecular arrangement of T9SS can be found in (18, 19). Our results suggest that T9SS is associated with the rotary component of the gliding motor and drives a tread carrying the adhesin SprB along a track fastened to the rigid framework of the cell wall.


The axis of rotation is localized near GldL

GldK, GldL, GldM, GldN, SprA, SprE, SprF, and SprT are the core T9SS proteins required for the transport of SprB to the external surface. ∆gldL mutants do not have SprB on the cell surface. They are not able to stick to a glass surface and do not display motility (17). We found that tethered cells of ∆gldL mutants complemented by GldL–yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) were able to bind to glass and exhibited wild-type levels of cell rotation (movie S1). This suggests that the rotary motor is fully functional in this strain.

Fluorescent GldL-YFP appeared as spots that were fixed in the frame of reference of a cell (Fig. 1A and movie S2). Using ImageJ and custom MATLAB codes C1 to C3 that fit a Gaussian to each GldL spot, the positions of GldL foci from 42 cells were determined. Custom MATLAB codes used in this article are freely available on GitHub ( The GldL spots appeared to be localized at random within a cell, with the average distance between two neighboring spots of about 1.5 μm (fig. S1). The peak of a Gaussian fit to a frequency distribution of number of foci per cell as measured from 42 cells is 3.47 with an SD of 0.87 (Fig. 1B). The total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscope used for these measurements strongly illuminates only the cylindrical face of the cell adjacent to the glass with a penetration depth around 100 nm. A similar distribution of GldL is expected on the opposite cylindrical face. Hence, the total number of GldL foci per cell is about seven.

Fig. 1 The axis of rotation is found near a GldL spot.

(A) One tethered cell with five GldL foci is shown, with one foci numbered 5 close to the axis of rotation; we call it the “nearest neighbor” GldL. The other foci execute circular arcs, as the cell rotates. The foci were spaced about 1.4 μm apart. (B) The distribution of numbers of GldL foci per cell for 42 cells. About four GldL foci appeared per cylindrical face of a cell. (C) Distances of the GldL foci of the tethered cell shown in (A) from the axis of rotation plotted as a function of time.

Using tethered cells of ∆gldL background complemented with GldL-YFP, the position of the axis of rotation was determined by adding successive images of an image stack of a rotating cell and fitting the new matrix that contains the sum of images with a Gaussian that has the X-Y coordinates as position and the Z coordinate as intensity. Code C4 was used to add successive images. Given that the axis of rotation remains fixed over all image frames of a rotating cell, for a matrix that contains the sum of stacks, the intensity is highest at the axis of rotation. All GldL foci in a rotating cell were tracked over several frames. All but one GldL spot per tethered cell showed a circular trajectory (Fig. 1A). The foci that did not move with an apparent circular trajectory were within a distance range of few hundred nanometers from the axis of rotation (Fig. 1C). This spot was named the “nearest neighbor” GldL.

Similar measurements were made for each image frame from image stacks of eight rotating tethered cells with 60 frames on average per image stack. This provided a total of 484 measurements. The SDs for the Gaussian fits to the images of the rotation axes and the nearest-neighbor GldL foci bloom up to the resolving power of the microscope. The position of nearest-neighbor GldL relative to the axis of rotation is shown for all eight cells in Fig. 2A, with the axis of rotation normalized to be at the origin. The position of nearest-neighbor GldL relative to the axis of rotation, one cell at a time, is shown in fig. S2. The peak of a Gaussian fit to a frequency distribution of distance between the nearest-neighbor GldL and the axis of rotation for all 484 measurements was 109.7 nm with an SD of 68.5 nm (Fig. 2B). These measurements tell us that the axis of rotation was found near a GldL spot, as expected if GldL is part of the rotary motor. However, we do not know whether GldL is centered on the rotation axis.

Fig. 2 Analysis of the position of GldL spots.

(A) A scatterplot of the positions of the nearest-neighbor GldL relative to the axis of rotation of eight tethered cells, with 60 frames on average imaged for each cell, resulting in 484 measurements. For each cell, the axis of rotation was normalized to be at the origin. (B) Frequency distribution of the distance of the nearest-neighbor GldL from the axis of rotation of eight tethered cells measured for a total of 484 image frames with about 60 image frames per cell. The peak of a Gaussian fit to this distribution is 109.7 nm with an SD of 68.47 nm.

Cell rotation and SprB motion use the same power source

A preparation of tethered cells was exposed to 10 μM carbonyl cyanide-m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP), which is known to abolish the proton motive force that acts across the inner cell membrane (21). The cells stopped rotating after the addition of CCCP and started rotating again after its removal (figs. S3 and S4 and movie S3). The loss of rotation was rapid and the recovery was gradual, taking about four times longer, as expected if time was required to wash CCCP out of the cells. These results are consistent with previous observations where motion of SprB was stopped after the addition of CCCP and was restored after washing it away (10). This suggests that both cell rotation and SprB translocation use the same fuel.

MreB, a protein that helps to build the cell wall, is involved in the gliding motility of a rod-shaped bacterium Myxococcus xanthus (22). A22, a drug that alters the motion of MreB and stops the gliding of M. xanthus (22), did not affect the gliding of F. johnsoniae (fig. S5). As in F. johnsoniae, binding of a cell-surface adhesin to an external surface results in gliding of M. xanthus. However, there are obvious differences between the gliding of the two types of bacteria. M. xanthus uses different motility proteins and glides about 60 times more slowly than F. johnsoniae.

The track on which SprB moves is close to the gliding motor

While the motor labeled by GldL-YFP is fixed on the cell surface, the SprB adhesin moves along the length of the cell. How rotation might be coupled to linear motion is a puzzle. The ∆gldL strain is complemented for rotary motor function by the addition of GldL-YFP (movie S1). However, the long-distance motion of the cell and the adhesin SprB is not fully restored; i.e., some cells and beads attached to SprB move very short distances (movie S1). This suggests that the C-terminal region of GldL might play a role in coupling the rotary motor with the motion of SprB. To study the long-distance movement of SprB in a gldL-yfp strain, a gldL-yfp–containing plasmid was added to wild-type cells to form a hybrid motor containing both GldL and GldL-YFP subunits. Western blot analysis suggests that GldL expressed from the chromosome and pCP23 is of similar cellular concentration (17). A Cy3 tag was attached to SprB via an antibody, and the positions of both SprB and GldL were determined within same cells (Fig. 3A, fig. S6, and movie S4). The shortest distance between the trajectory of SprB labeled with Cy3 and motors labeled with GldL-YFP was measured for 42 motors from 10 cells. The average positions of SprB labeled with Cy3 and GldL-YFP (motor) were determined by fitting Gaussians to respective foci from all frames of an image stack. The positions of motors were at a distance (d) of 90.9 nm with an SD of 63.7 nm from the SprB trajectory (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3 GldL localizes near the track on which SprB moves.

(A) Colocalization of GldL (green circles) with the trajectory of SprB (blue dots and red line). GldL remains fixed relative to the cell. SprB moves along the trajectory shown in red. Blue dots mark the positions of SprB determined at different time points. Red lines are second-order polynomial fits to the blue dots. GldL was labeled with YFP and SprB with Cy3. The position of SprB and GldL-YFP from the same cell is determined from movie S4 and fig. S6B, respectively. The images were rotated and translated to determine the positions of SprB and GldL-YFP relative to the cell. (B) Frequency distribution of the distance of 42 motors from SprB trajectories for 10 cells, showing a peak at a distance of 90.9 nm with an SD of 63.7 nm. (C) A simulation in which 42 motors were localized at random on one cell, with the positions of the motors (green) and the track (red). (D) A frequency distribution of distances between the motors and the track.

As a control, a simulation in which 42 motors were randomly localized in one cell was performed, together with the SprB trajectory from one cell. This simulation was carried out using a random number generator in MATLAB and similar boundaries as that of a cell in an image plane were used. The shortest distances between the motors and the track were measured for the simulation. The distribution for these distances was broad and did not show a discernible peak near 90 nm (Fig. 3, C and D).

Tracks carrying SprB did not loop around GldL spots. This argues against a model in which chains carrying SprB are driven by sprockets (7). A viable alternative, explained below, involves racks and pinions.

A model for gliding is suggested in which a pinion attached to the rotary motor’s drive shaft engages a rack (a tread) that slides along a track fixed to the rigid framework of the cell wall

A cartoon illustrating this idea is shown in Fig. 4A. A combination of a pinion (a circular gear) and a rack (a straight element with teeth matching those on the gear) is a common device for converting rotary motion into linear motion. If the motor rotates at frequency f and the radius of the pinion is r, then the rack will move at velocity v = 2πrf, which is the gliding speed (about 1.5 μm/s). Given the maximum f that the rotary motor exhibits is about 3 Hz (11), we find r = v/2πf = 80 nm, which is on the mark.

Fig. 4 A model of the gliding machinery.

(A) A cross-sectional view of a cell with a rotary gliding motor (blue), a mobile tread (green), a stationary track (red), and an adhesin (magenta). The rotary motor and the track are anchored to the peptidoglycan (PG), and the track is wound spirally around the cell. The rotary motor drives a pinion that engages a mobile tread (rack) that slides along the track. The adhesin, SprB, is attached to the tread and moves with it. The dimension d is the distance between the axis of rotation of the motor and the center of the track, and r is the radius of the pinion. OM, outer membrane; CM, cytoplasmic membrane. (B) A side view of a cell with a rotary motor powering the motion of a tread carrying SprB. See movie S5 for an animation of this model.

The rotary motor, although it runs at constant speed (11), could be similar in architecture to the flagellar rotary motor, with a rotor embedded in the inner cell membrane surrounded by stator elements (the stationary part of a motor) anchored to the peptidoglycan layer and a drive shaft that passes through the peptidoglycan with the aid of a bushing. The pinion would be mounted on the drive shaft but could rotate under or within the outer cell membrane, driving the tread along a track anchored to the peptidoglycan. Only SprB needs to extend beyond the outer cell membrane. An animation of the behavior of our model is shown in Fig. 4B and movie S5.


It appears that the presence of multiple SprBs ensures smooth gliding; i.e., if several SprBs are mounted on a given tread, a cell can glide continuously. An electron microscope image suggests that there are about 40 SprBs on a given cell (10). So, there will be about 20 on one cylindrical face of a cell. An SprB arriving at the back of a cell can peel off the substrate to be replaced by new SprB adsorbed to the substrate at the front of the cell. As a result, the cell can glide smoothly over many body lengths. However, if a single SprB is mounted on a given tread, then that SprB will remain fixed and the free end of the cell will lift off the surface and flip over, allowing the cell to continue to glide in the same direction but without any net progress. Gliding cells often display flips; i.e., the lagging pole of a cell gliding in the x-y image plane gets stuck to glass, and the leading pole rises up along the z axis and moves rapidly, forming an arc such that it moves behind the lagging pole (fig. S7 and movie S5). The flips are illustrated in fig. 1 and movie S1 of (7) and in fig. 4 of (23). After a flip, the direction along which a cell glides changes.

At the time of the early work (23), no gliding motility proteins were known; all that could be surmised was that sites able to adhere to the substrate moved the length of a cell along tracks fixed to the rigid framework of the cell wall. Fluorescent labeling of proteins that enable gliding motility has improved our knowledge of the mechanism. Future experiments will be aimed toward functional characterization of proteins that form this machinery. Several F. johnsoniae mutants are deficient in proteins that either form the T9SS or are involved in the stability of the T9SS proteins. In these mutants, SprB is not secreted to the cell surface and the cells do not glide. Of more interest are mutants that do secrete SprB to the cell surface but, nonetheless, are not able to glide. Cells that lack the C-terminal region of GldJ (24), a protein that is not a part of the T9SS, are an example. Recently, it was found that when the C-terminal 8 to 13 amino acid regions of GldJ are deleted, secretion via the T9SS is fine, while motion of SprB on the cell surface is significantly reduced. GldJ localizes helically, is an outer-membrane lipoprotein (25), and might be associated with the tread/track complex. Identification of additional components of the rack and pinion assembly will enhance our understanding of bacterial gliding.


Strains and plasmids

A GldL-YFP fusion was generated by amplifying eYFP from pHL55 (26) using primers P65 and P67 (for primers, see the Supplementary Materials) and cloning it into the vector pCP23. gldL was amplified using primers P63 and P64 and was cloned into pCP23 with YFP to generate the plasmid pAS6 such that the C terminus of GldL was fused with the N terminus of YFP. Strains were grown at 25°C with shaking, as described previously (1).

TIRF imaging of GldL in tethered cells

Cells were tethered using a protocol described previously (11). To image rotating tethered bacteria with GldL-YFP, a microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti-U; Nikon, Melville, NJ) with an Apo TIRF 60× 1.49 numerical aperture (NA) objective was used in TIRF mode. A 515-nm, 25-mW laser was used as an excitation source. Fluorescent images were recorded with an Andor Ixon Camera. Phase-contrast images were recorded at the same time in the near infrared using a ThorLabs DCC1545M-GL camera. Images were analyzed using the ImageJ plugin Trackmate (27) and custom MATLAB codes.

Simultaneous TIRF imaging of SprB and GldL

SprB was labeled with Cy3 as follows: 2 μl of 1:10 diluted purified anti-SpB antibody (1) and 2 μl of Cy3 conjugated Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG Polyclonal Antibody (VWR R611-104-122) were added to 40 μl of 0.4 Optical Density bacterial culture and incubated for 10 min at 25°C. After incubation, the preparation was centrifuged at 12,000g for 5 min. The supernatant fraction was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in 40 μl of motility medium [MM; per liter: 1.1 g of Bacto Casitone, 0.55 g of yeast extract, and 1.1 mM tris (pH 7.5)]. A tunnel slide was prepared, and 40 μl of bovine serum albumin (10 mg/ml) was added to the tunnel and allowed to stand for 1 min, after which the Cy3-labeled cells were flowed into one end of the tunnel, and a Kimwipe was used to wick the excess fluid from the other end. This preparation was allowed to stand for 10 min and then was washed twice in the tunnel slide with 40 μl of MM.

To image YFP and Cy3 signals simultaneously, the TIRF system described above was used with a Photometrics DV2 attachment with yellow and red filters (Chroma ET 535/30 and ET 630/75, respectively) to image YFP on one side of the screen and Cy3 on the other. Using a custom MATLAB code, Gaussians with the position along the x-y axis and intensity along the z axis were fit to the Cy3 and YFP spots in each image frame. The position of the peak of each Gaussian fit was recorded as the average position of each spot.

Addition of CCCP and A22

Wild-type F. johnsoniae cells were sheared and tethered to a glass coverslip and attached to a flow cell, and rotation speed was measured as described previously (11). A CCCP stock was prepared (10 μM in MM and added at a rate of 50 μl/min using a syringe pump, Harvard Apparatus 22). To remove the drug, MM was pumped into the flow cell.

A22 (50 μg/ml; Millipore Sigma, catalog no. 475951) was added to cells gliding on glass in a tunnel slide, as described previously. Cells were imaged using a phase-contrast microscope with a Nikon Plan 40× BM NA 0.65 objective (Nikon, Melville, NY) and a Thorlabs DCC1545M-GL (Thorlabs, Newton, NJ) camera. Images were analyzed using a custom MATLAB code.


Supplementary material for this article is available at

Primers used in the study

Computer scripts

Fig. S1. A frequency distribution of nearest-neighbor distances between 42 GldL foci found on 10 cells.

Fig. S2. Position of the nearest-neighbor GldL foci from the axis of rotation of eight tethered cells shown for the individual cells.

Fig. S3. Rotation speed of a cell plotted as a function of time.

Fig. S4. The rate for the “drop” in rotation speed after addition of CCCP (red linear regression fit) is four times faster than the rate of increase following removal of CCCP.

Fig. S5. Speed of a smooth gliding cell measured by tracking the center of mass does not change after the addition of A22.

Fig. S6. A cell with SprB-Cy3 and GldL-YFP labels.

Fig. S7. Tracking the flips displayed by gliding cells.

Movie S1. A phase-contrast image stack where GldL-YFP strain displays wild-type levels of rotation. Similar to sheared and tethered wild-type cells, two cells in the field of view display rotation. Other cells attach to glass and beads coated with anti-SprB antibody. Some cells and beads display motion over short distances.

Movie S2. A tethered cell with five fluorescent GldL spots. The cell appears to rotate around a fixed axis.

Movie S3. A phase-contrast image stack showing that addition of CCCP stops rotation of a tethered cell.

Movie S4. A Cy3-tagged SprB moving along the length of a cell. For this movie, a filter that allows only Cy3 emission to pass was used.

Movie S5. An animation of the model suggesting how a molecular rack and pinion could drive gliding. The pinion is blue, the tread is green, and the adhesin SprB is magenta.

Movie S6. A cell gliding smoothly over a glass surface.

Movie S7. A gliding cell displaying flips.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.


Acknowledgments: Funding: This work was supported by National Institutes of Health K99/R00 grant DE026826 to A.S. and an R01 grant AI016478 to H.C.B. Author contributions: A.S. and H.C.B. designed the experiments and wrote the paper. A.S. performed the experiments. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.
View Abstract

Stay Connected to Science Advances

Navigate This Article