Chiral superconductivity in the alternate stacking compound 4Hb-TaS2

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science Advances  27 Mar 2020:
Vol. 6, no. 13, eaax9480
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax9480


Van der Waals materials offer unprecedented control of electronic properties via stacking of different types of two-dimensional materials. A fascinating frontier, largely unexplored, is the stacking of strongly correlated phases of matter. We study 4Hb-TaS2, which naturally realizes an alternating stacking of 1T-TaS2 and 1H-TaS2 structures. The former is a well-known Mott insulator, which has recently been proposed to host a gapless spin-liquid ground state. The latter is a superconductor known to also host a competing charge density wave state. This raises the question of how these two components affect each other when stacked together. We find a superconductor with a Tc of 2.7 Kelvin and anomalous properties, of which the most notable one is a signature of time-reversal symmetry breaking, abruptly appearing at the superconducting transition. This observation is consistent with a chiral superconducting state.


Chiral superconductors have received much attention in recent years as a canonical example of a topological phase of matter. Theoretically, they are predicted to host Majorana bound states in the vortex cores or at sample edges (1, 2), which have non-Abelian mutual statistics. Beyond the fundamental importance of observing such a phenomena, it has also been proposed as a useful technology for quantum memory and quantum computation (3). Chiral superconductors are characterized by an order parameter that is odd under time-reversal symmetry (TRS) and is manifested by magnetic fields at edges and defects (4). Therefore, they can be detected with probes such as muon spin relaxation (5) and polar Kerr effect (6).

Of all the known superconductors, only few exhibit signatures of TRS breaking, and even fewer are candidates for this elusive chiral phase. The best known among them are Sr2RuO4, believed to be of p + ip symmetry (5), and UPt3 (7), a potential f + if superconductor, as well as the heavy-fermion superconductor URu2Si2 (8) and SrPtAs (9, 10), which were suggested to be of d + id symmetry. Open questions remain, however, in all cases (1113). Specifically, recent nuclear magnetic resonance measurements of Sr2RuO4 show a clear decrease in the Knight shift on entering the superconducting state, casting doubt on the p-wave nature of the superconducting order parameter (11).

In this work, we show evidence for chiral superconductivity in the transition-metal dichalcogenide 4Hb-TaS2. We show that this polymorph of TaS2 is a superconductor with a relatively high Tc and anomalous transport properties. 4Hb-TaS2 exhibits a spontaneous appearance of magnetic moments with the onset of superconductivity.

4Hb-TaS2 belongs to the P63/mmc hexagonal space group, with a unit cell that consists of alternating layers of 1H-TaS2 (half of 2H-TaS2) and 1T-TaS2 (see Fig. 1A). The overall crystal is inversion symmetric, with the inversion point lying in the center of the 1T layer. The weak interlayer coupling allows us to describe 4Hb-TaS2 as a stack of two-dimensional (2D) monolayers: 1H-TaS2 with a locally broken inversion symmetry giving rise to antisymmetric spin-orbit coupling (14) and 1T-TaS2, known as a Mott insulator that fails to order magnetically (15). Recently, it was proposed that the ground state of 1T-TaS2 is a gapless quantum spin liquid (16, 17, 18). Thus, 4Hb-TaS2 is a system in which superconducting layers naturally reside in proximity to layers that have strong spin fluctuations. Consequently, it realizes a unique heterostructure of strongly correlated phases with drastically different ground states, albeit having the exact same chemical composition and almost the same structure.

Fig. 1 Structure of 4Hb-TaS2.

(A) 3D schematic drawing of a unit cell of 4Hb-TaS2 showing the alternate stacking of octahedral (T) and trigonal prismatic (H) layers. Top views of 1H and 1T layers are shown in (B) and (C), respectively. The top view of the 1H layer displays the in-plane broken mirror symmetry. (D) An ARPES detector image obtained at T = 15 K using 72 eV of photon energy reveals the electronic band structure along the Γ-M direction. (E) A Fermi surface mapping under the same conditions. The band structure is a combination of 2H-TaS2 and CDW reconstructed 1T-TaS2, which was rigidly shifted toward the Fermi level [horizontal white dashed line in (D)]. The dashed line represents the 2H-TaS2 Fermi surface.


We have grown single crystals of 4Hb-TaS2−xSex with x = 0.01, using a standard chemical vapor transport method (19). The small amount of Se stabilizes the 4Hb structure. Details about the sample preparation process and the structure characterization appear in the Supplementary Materials.

4Hb-TaS2 was first synthesized by Di Salvo et al. (19). The transport data can be described as a mixture of 1T and 2H, with metallic conductivity in the ab plane and semiconducting conductivity along the c axis. The in-plane resistivity was shown to be three orders of magnitude smaller than the out-of-plane resistivity. This “mixture” of 1T and 2H is also visible in the x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectrum of the Ta 4f core levels, which displays three peaks—two from the “1T” layers and one from the “1H” layers (fig. S2) (20).

The electronic dispersion along the Γ-M direction was measured using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) and is presented in Fig. 1D. The main finding is that the band structure of the 4Hb-TaS2 is a mixture of the metallic 2H layer and the band structure of the 1T shifted toward the Fermi level, leaving no spectral gap. This should be compared with the 1T structure where a bandgap of 0.2 eV was measured and interpreted as a Mott gap (21, 22). The parts of the band structure associated with the 1T and the 1H layers are marked in the figure.

Two electron pockets, similar to the ones in 2H-TaS2, can be observed surrounding the points k=±1/Å together with the shifted band structure of 1T-TaS2. The 1T part of the band structure is reconstructed by the well-known 13×13 charge density wave (CDW).

An ARPES intensity map at the Fermi level is shown in Fig. 1E. The intensity map reveals that within the alternate-stacking layered crystal, every layer retains its original electronic dispersion. The Fermi surface is a mixture of the Fermi surface of 2H-TaS2 with its familiar dog-bone–shaped pockets around the M points and the reconstructed 1T-TaS2 bands contribution around the Γ point.

Figure 2A shows Ce/T versus T, where Ce is the electronic part of the specific heat after the removal of the phonon contribution (for details, see the Supplementary Materials). The transition into a superconducting state below Tc = 2.7 K is seen both in specific heat and resistance measurements (see inset in Fig. 2B), which is substantially enhanced compared to bulk 2H-TaS2 (Tc = 0.7 K). The enhancement is most likely the result of the 1T layers that create a buffer layer between the 1H and 1H′ layers. A similar enhancement was observed in 2H-TaS2 samples, where a buffer layer was intercalated (23, 24), and in 2D flakes (25, 26).

Fig. 2 Specific heat and transport measurements.

(A) The electronic contribution to the heat capacity divided by the temperature Ce/T is plotted as function of T. The dashed line represents the total electronic specific heat in the normal state, and the dotted line is a residual linear contribution coming from the 1T layers (see the main text for details). (B) The electronic-specific heat after the removal of the 1T contribution displaying a BCS-type behavior with Δ = 0.4 meV. Inset: Resistance versus temperature shows enhanced Tc. (C) Hc2 as a function of temperature for in-plane (red circles) and out-of-plane (blue triangles) field orientations. For better visibility, Hc2 is multiplied by 10. Inset: The angular dependence of Hc2 showing strong anisotropy.

The heat capacity Ce(T) also exhibits a residual linear-in-T contribution observed below Tc (finite intersect in the T → 0 limit marked by the dotted line in Fig. 2A). This residual contribution is independent of magnetic field and amounts to 15% of the normal-state heat capacity (dashed line). Furthermore, it has been reproduced in samples from different growth batches showing the same magnitude, supporting that this residual contribution is an intrinsic effect relevant to the physics in 4Hb-TaS2.

After the subtraction of the residual heat capacity, we obtain a standard s-wave–like shape that decays exponentially to zero (Fig. 2B). The extracted gap Δ is found to be 0.4 ± 0.05 meV(see the Supplementary Materials for more details), in good agreement with the transverse field muon spin rotation (μSR) results shown in the Supplementary Materials. Thus far, the picture emerging is that of a fully gapped superconductor coexisting with a second phase with a constant density of states, at least down to an energy resolution equivalent to 300 mK.

In the inset of Fig. 2C, we show the critical field, Hc2, as a function of the angle θ, between the applied field and the ab plane (θ = 0 denotes field aligned in the plane), measured at T = 30 mK. The magneto-resistance exhibits strong anisotropy, with Hc2/Hc2>17. The angular dependence of Hc2, plotted in the inset, is consistent with the predictions of a highly anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau theory (see the Supplementary Materials), reflecting the quasi-2D nature of superconductivity in 4Hb-TaS2.

We also note that a naïve calculation of the Clogston-Chandrasekhar limit using the estimated minimal gap from the exponential decay of the specific heat (see the Supplementary Materials) Δ0min=0.36 meV, yields a paramagnetic limit of Hp = 5 T, much smaller than the observed Hc2. Moreover, because of strong Ising spin-orbit coupling, we anticipate the critical Zeeman field to greatly exceed this value (27).

The quasi-2D picture is further supported by the temperature dependence of Hc2 shown in Fig. 2C. We observe an unusual linear dependence of the in-plane critical field through the entire temperature range. Similar behavior has been reported in Bi2Se3 under pressure (28), where it was interpreted as a result of a polar p-wave state, and also in KOs2O6, where it was ascribed to a multiband effect (29). We note that the Zeeman-limited Hc2 typically results in a nonlinear temperature dependence, and thus, we argue that even the in-plane field is most likely orbitally limited.

To extract coherence lengths from the orbital limited fields, we use the highly anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau theory. The in-plane coherence length is found from the perpendicular critical field (see Fig. 2C) ξab=ϕ02πHc=186 Å, and using Hc2=ϕ0ξabξc, we find the out-of-plane coherence length to be ξc=9.8 Å. This length is comparable to the interlayer spacing of 1H layers. We can therefore conclude that 4Hb-TaS2 is a stack of weakly coupled 2D superconductors with weak orbital out-of-plane tunneling currents.

We now turn to the main result of our work: evidence of TRS breaking in the superconducting state seen in a μSR measurement. In the absence of a magnetic order, the muon depolarization is a result of the randomly oriented static nuclear dipole moments and is described by the static Gaussian Kubo-Toyabe function (30)Gz(t)=13+23(1σ2t2)exp(12σ2t2)(1)where σ/γμ is the local field distribution width, and γμ is the muon gyromagnetic ratio. The nuclear field distribution is temperature independent.

In Fig. 3, we show the temperature dependence of the muon depolarization rate in the absence of a magnetic field. We find an abrupt increase of the rate at T = Tc. This is a clear indication of a spontaneous appearance of magnetic moments in the sample due to the superconducting state. In the inset of Fig. 3, we present two representative Zero Field muon spin resonance spectra, above and below Tc (at 6 and 0.05 K, respectively). On the basis of the increase in σ , we estimate the width of the randomly oriented magnetic field in the sample to be ~0.12 G.

Fig. 3 TRS breaking.

A sudden increase in the zero-field muon spin relaxation rate σ is observed at Tc (marked by the vertical line), marking the onset of TRS breaking. The dotted line is a guide to the eye. The inset shows two ZF-μSR spectra at different temperatures, above and below Tc. The black lines are best fits to Eq. 1.

Theoretical interpretation

With the onset of TRS breaking coinciding with the superconducting Tc, it is natural to assume an origin intrinsic to the superconducting phase for this TRS breaking. This leads to chiral superconductivity as a compelling explanation of TRS breaking: In such a state, magnetic moments are expected to appear due to local variations in the chiral order parameter resulting, for example, from edges or defects in the sample (4). Such a state is allowed by the hexagonal point group symmetry of 4Hb-TaS2 as we discuss below. While there are other scenarios that can account for signatures of TRS breaking within a superconducting phase, notably, combinations of nearly degenerate symmetry-distinct order parameters or frustrated interband Cooper-pair scattering, these generically happen not at Tc but at a distinctly lower temperature (9). Thus, the most probable picture emerging from the data is that of a quasi-2D fully gapped chiral superconductor.

In the following, we discuss topological properties of such a chiral state. The weak interlayer coupling discussed above motivates us to study the superconducting state on isolated 1H layers with point group symmetry D3h. With TRS present in the normal state, chiral superconductivity requires a multicomponent gap function. Within the relevant symmetry group, there is only one such representation (31), which allows us to pinpoint the gap functionΔE(k)=Δ0[(1α)ekσ0+αοk*σz]iσy(2)where ek=j=13ωjcos(kTj) and οk=j=13ωjsin(kTj) are the d-wave and p-wave basis functions in the D3h point group. Here, we have chosen only one chirality, in other words, only Cooper pairs with positive orbital angular momentum, while their negative counterparts are given by complex conjugation. The vectors ±Tj point to the six nearest neighbors on the triangular Ta lattice, ω = exp (2πi/3), and α is a non-universal weight, which quantifies the mixing of the d-wave and p-wave components that is allowed by the lack of an inversion center in the plane. Last, σ0 and σi denote the identity and Pauli matrices. Note that because of the alternate stacking of the 1H layers, the relative phase of the order parameters in Eq. 2 changes from layer to layer (31).

Chiral superconductivity belongs to symmetry class D in the 10-fold way (32), which allows us to classify isolated 1H layers using a Chern number. Using a tight-binding model for TaS2 including up to the third-nearest-neighbor hopping (27, 33), we compute the Chern number within a BdG Hamiltonian as a function of α, allowing us to interpolate between the pure d + id- and p + ip-wave pairing channels. The phase of the superconducting order parameter in Eq. 2 is presented in Fig. 4 (A and B) for the extreme cases α = 0 (purely d-wave) and α = 1 (purely p-wave), respectively. We find that the Chern number vanishes in the limit of α = 0, i.e., ∁ = 0, because the inner and outer Fermi surfaces cancel each other. On the other hand, the Chern density is cooperative in the limit α = 1, where we obtain ∁ = −6. The interpolation between these two points is plotted in Fig. 4C. Note that the data points were computed numerically (not rounded to an integer) using the full BdG band structure with a mesh grid of 9.5 × 104 equally spaced points. Overall, we find that the Chern number of the Chiral state is highly sensitive to the mixing ratio α (34). A challenging experimental goal is thus to measure a quantized thermal Hall conductance in this system.

Fig. 4 Superconducting order parameter.

(A) and (B) show the phase of the gap functions ek and οk, respectively, superimposed on the Fermi surface of 1H-TaS2. (C) The corresponding Chern number as a function of the mixing parameter α appearing in Eq. 2. Note that the values presented here were computed numerically and are not rounded to an integer.


We first address the question of the residual linear heat capacity observed below Tc (Fig. 2A). The scenario of macroscopic phase separation, where portions of the sample remain metallic, can be ruled out by the Transverse field muon spin rotation data. The TF-μSR measurements were performed in field cooling conditions, and we found 100% superconducting volume fraction at base temperature. Furthermore, we found only small sample-to-sample variation in the magnitude of this residual term.

A possible scenario is that the proximity gap induced in 1T layers is much smaller than the gap in the 1H and 1H′ layers, thus a temperature lower than our base temperature of 300 mK will be needed to suppress the contribution of the 1T layers to the specific heat. This is a plausible explanation given the large Fermi surface mismatch shown in Fig. 1E, which naturally leads to a weak proximity effect.

Another possible explanation for the linear heat capacity is a spin-glass state (35), forming at the 1T layers. The x-ray analysis indicates highly clean crystal structure and, therefore, any mechanism leading to such a state must be intrinsic (e.g., frustrated interactions). However, this state seems unlikely given that the time dependence of the μSR signal does not fit the classic glass behavior (36, 37). Moreover, the magnitude of the residual is independent of field, and lastly, no spin-glass behavior in the susceptibility has been observed in earlier studies (23).

A more exotic scenario is that this contribution is coming from a neutral Fermi surface coexisting with the superconducting state. A gapless spin-liquid state has been proposed for the 1T polytype of TaS2 (16, 17).

We now turn to the microscopic origin of the possible chiral superconductivity. Phonon-mediated interactions typically favor s-wave pairing (38). In such a case, unconventional pairing is expected only if strong local repulsion, which reduces the attraction in the s-wave channel, is present. On the other hand, an attractive interaction mediated by spin fluctuations naturally prefers non–s-wave superconductivity and, in particular, chiral symmetry when the Fermi surface encloses the Γ point as given here (see Fig. 1E). From this perspective, it is interesting to understand whether the proximity between the superconductor in the 1H layers and the Mott insulating state in the 1T layers is an essential ingredient. Our ARPES data in Fig. 1E suggest the possibility that the Mott insulator is lightly doped due to the stacking structure, resulting in strong spin fluctuations. Electronic pairing mediated by spin fluctuations in a quantum spin ice has been studied in (39) for the case of a rotationally symmetric Fermi surface. There, the authors found that the strongest pairing channel is odd-parity with the possibility of a multicomponent order parameter, consistent with the chiral superconductor proposed here. The results presented here, thus, raise a host of theoretical questions regarding the interaction between superconductivity, charged, and neutral itinerant fermionic excitations, which invite further study.

To summarize, we have investigated 4Hb-TaS2 and found signs of TRS breaking in the form of an abrupt rise in the muon relaxation rate upon cooling below the superconducting transition temperature. Given the hexagonal symmetry and the Fermi surface topology, these findings suggest that 4Hb-TaS2 is a chiral superconductor. We further show that the unique structure of 4Hb-TaS2 consisting of stacked, weakly coupled layers of 1H-TaS2 and 1T-TaS2 results in a band structure, which combines the properties of both constituents: a 2D superconductor (1H) and a doped Mott insulator proposed to be a gapless spin liquid (1T). Both constituents show clear signatures both in ARPES and in the low-temperature specific heat. Its relatively high superconducting Tc ≃ 2.7 K, the quasi-2D structure, and the ability to grow very large and clean single crystals make this material a promising platform for future study and applications. Furthermore, it opens new directions in the study of topological superconductivity using van der Waals heterostructures.


High-quality single crystals of 4Hb-TaS2 were prepared using the chemical vapor transport method. The appropriate amounts of Ta and S were ground and mixed with a small amount of Se (1% of the S amount). The powder was sealed in a Quartz ampoule, and a small amount of iodine was added as a transport agent. The ampoule was placed in a three-zone furnace such that the powder is in the hot zone. After 30 days, single crystals with a typical size of 5 mm × 5 mm × 0.1 mm grew in the cold zone of the furnace.

High-resolution ARPES measurements were performed at the I05 beamline at Diamond (Didcot, UK) and at the SIS Beamline at the SLS (Villigen, Switzerland) using a photon energy of 72 eV. The samples were cleaved in vacuum better than 5 × 10−11 torr at base temperature and measured for not more than 6 hours. The samples were measured at a temperature of 10 K. The energy resolution was 6 meV in both beamlines.

Both zero-field and transverse-field μSR measurements were performed at the DOLLY beamline at PSI (Villigen, Switzerland) over a temperature range from 7 K down to 300 mK. The transverse-field measurements were performed using a 145-G field.

Heat capacity measurements at various fields were performed using Quantum Design PPMS He3 probe. The addenda was measured in all fields and temperatures to ensure proper background subtraction.

Transport properties were measured using standard lock-in technique in a dilution refrigerator equipped with an 18-T magnet and a rotator probe at the Tallahassee National Laboratory. For the higher temperature range, a He3 probe in a PPMS was used.


Supplementary material for this article is available at

Section S1. Crystal growth and characterization

Section S2. Electrical transport and magnetization measurements

Section S3. Heat capacity measurements

Section S4. Muon spin rotation measurements

Section S5. Gap structure

Fig. S1. X-ray diffraction of 4Hb-TaS2 single crystals.

Fig. S2. XPS spectrum of 4Hb-TaS2.

Fig. S3. Transport measurements.

Fig. S4. Heat capacity measurements.

Fig. S5. Muon spin relaxation results.

Fig. S6. Tight-binding band structure.

References (4047)

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.


Acknowledgments: We thank I. Kimchi, M. Schechter, and P. Lee for constructive discussions and D. Levy for help with the x-ray diffraction. The μSR measurements were performed at the Swiss Muon Source (SμS) at the Paul Scherrer Institute in Villigen, Switzerland. We acknowledge the Paul Scherrer Institut (Villigen, Switzerland) for provision of synchrotron radiation beam time at beamline HRPES-SIS of the SLS. Some of this work was carried out with the support of the Diamond Light Source, instrument IO5 (proposal SI15822). A portion of this work was performed at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, which is supported by the NSF Cooperative Agreement No. DMR-1644779 and the State of Florida. Funding: This work was supported by the Israeli Science Foundation (work at the Technion under grant no. 320/17, work at Tel-Aviv University under grant no. 382/17 and work at Bar-Ilan university under grant no. 994/19). Author contributions: A.R. and A.K. initiated the project. K.C. grew the crystals, and A.R. and A.K. conducted the μSR and ARPES experiments in PSI and Diamond. A.R., R.M.S., M.M., P.K.R., Y.D., and A.K. conducted transport measurements. R.M.S. and Y.D. conducted the specific heat measurements. M.M. and P.K.R. conducted the experiment at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory. M.H.F. and J.R. conducted theoretical calculations and model. A.R., R.M.S., M.H.F., J.R., Y.D., and A.K. wrote the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.
View Abstract

Stay Connected to Science Advances

Navigate This Article