Research ArticlePHYSICS

Attosecond timing of electron emission from a molecular shape resonance

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science Advances  31 Jul 2020:
Vol. 6, no. 31, eaba7762
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aba7762

Abstract

Shape resonances in physics and chemistry arise from the spatial confinement of a particle by a potential barrier. In molecular photoionization, these barriers prevent the electron from escaping instantaneously, so that nuclei may move and modify the potential, thereby affecting the ionization process. By using an attosecond two-color interferometric approach in combination with high spectral resolution, we have captured the changes induced by the nuclear motion on the centrifugal barrier that sustains the well-known shape resonance in valence-ionized N2. We show that despite the nuclear motion altering the bond length by only 2%, which leads to tiny changes in the potential barrier, the corresponding change in the ionization time can be as large as 200 attoseconds. This result poses limits to the concept of instantaneous electronic transitions in molecules, which is at the basis of the Franck-Condon principle of molecular spectroscopy.

INTRODUCTION

Shape resonances, due to trapping of particles in potential barriers, are ubiquitous in nature. First discovered by Fermi et al. when studying slow-neutron capture in artificial radioactivity (1, 2), they have since been the focus of countless investigations in physics, chemistry, and biology. They play a crucial role in α-decay of radioactive nuclei (3), molecular fragmentation (4), rotational predissociation (5), electron detachment (6), ultracold collisions (7), low-energy electron scattering (8, 9), and photoionization (10, 11), to name a few. They are also thought to be at the origin of enhanced radiation damage of DNA and other biomolecules (12) and to play an important role in the stability of Bose-Einstein condensates (13). Shape resonances are usually associated to specific spectral features. For instance, they lead to broad peaks in the photoionization spectrum of atoms and molecules (14–17) and to a strong variation in the corresponding photoelectron angular distribution as a function of kinetic energy (18).

The energies at which these resonances are expected to appear and the corresponding trapping times (or conversely, decay lifetimes) are entirely determined by the shape of the barrier seen by the trapped (or ejected) particle, hence the name “shape resonances.” Thus, the analysis of the resonance peaks observed in experimental spectra can be used to infer the actual height and width of the potential barrier seen by the impinging or emitted particle. This can be unambiguously done in atomic systems. However, in molecules, the situation is more complicated, as nuclear motion may cause the potential felt by the electrons to change during a vibrational period, thus affecting the shape of the barrier. This was theoretically predicted back in 1979 by Dehmer, who argued that the anomalous variations of vibrationally resolved photoelectron angular distributions of N2 with photon energy could be the consequence of changes in the shape of the potential barrier with the internuclear distance (10). This prediction has been the subject of debate for years (11). So far, direct time-resolved measurements of the dynamical evolution of shape resonances as the molecule vibrates have not been possible due to the lack of temporal resolution.

In this work, we investigate with attosecond time resolution the changes induced by the vibrational motion on the potential barrier that sustains the 3σg−1 shape resonance in N2. We do so by ionizing the molecule with extreme ultraviolet (XUV) radiation consisting of high-order harmonics spanning an energy range between 20 and 40 eV (see Fig. 1A). Temporal information is obtained by using the RABBIT (reconstruction of attosecond beating by interference of two-photon transitions) interferometric method, described below (19). In particular, we determine the (relative) photoionization delay, which is the time the electron takes to escape from the molecular potential and is thus sensitive to the presence of a shape resonance. With the support of theoretical calculations that explicitly describe the photoionization process and take into account the vibrational motion, we show that changes in the molecular bond length of only 0.02 Å can lead to variations of the photoionization delay as large as 200 as and are not uniform over the investigated energy range. These measurements with attosecond time resolution show that molecular photoionization in the vicinity of shape resonances cannot be described in terms of the commonly accepted Franck-Condon picture, in which electronic excitation is assumed to be instantaneous and decoupled from the nuclear motion.

Fig. 1 Photoionization scheme.

(A) A comb of high-order harmonics (HH), spanning over the photon energy range of 20 to 40 eV, probes the entire shape resonance region in N2+. The blue dashed line corresponds to experimental photoionization cross sections [taken from (30)] across the resonance. The scheme for generating sideband 18 (SB18) is denoted by the vertical arrows. The violet (red) arrows denote XUV (NIR) photons. (B) Potential energy curves of the ground state of N2:Σg+1 (black), and lowest three states of N2+:X2Σg+ (blue), A2Πu+ (red), and B2Σu+ (green). The shaded area (1.06 to 1.14 Å) denotes the Franck-Condon region. The horizontal lines show the position of different vibrational levels associated with the corresponding electronic state.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The RABBIT technique has been widely used to determine accurate photoionization delays in atoms (20, 21) and, following the pioneering work of Haessler et al. (22), has started to be applied to molecular systems as well (23–25). Here, N2 is ionized by a comb of odd high-order harmonics, covering the 3σg−1 shape resonance (see Fig. 1A). Electrons are mainly removed from the 3σg and 1πu orbitals of the N2 molecule in its Σg+1 ground state, leading to N2+ ions in the X2Σg+ and A2Πu+ states (X and A states for short), respectively (see Fig. 1B).

In our experiment (see Materials and Methods for details), a near-infrared (NIR) 45-fs laser pulse generated high-order harmonics in argon, corresponding to a train of attosecond pulses in the time domain (26). The harmonics and a weak replica of the NIR pulse (probe) were focused into an effusive gas jet containing N2 molecules. The ejected electrons were detected by a magnetic bottle electron spectrometer with a resolution up to E/ΔE ∼ 80. To use the best possible resolution and hence resolve the vibrational levels in the first two outer valence states of the N2+ ion, we retarded photoelectrons by suitable voltages before entering into the spectrometer flight tube. The measurements consisted in recording, for alternating shots, the XUV-only and XUV + NIR photoelectron spectra (PES) as a function of the delay (τ) between the XUV and NIR pulses.

We perform simulations to explicitly obtain the vibrationally resolved PES resulting from the interaction of an isolated N2 molecule with an XUV attosecond pulse train and a time-delayed NIR pulse, so that the extracted time delays can be directly compared with experiment. The time-dependent Schrödinger equation is numerically solved including the bound-bound, bound-continuum, and continuum-continuum dipole transition matrix elements between the electronic states. These are computed using the static exchange density functional theory method described in (27). The nuclear motion is taken into account within the Born-Oppenheimer approximation (see the “Theoretical Methods” section in the Supplementary Materials for a detailed explanation), and the laser parameters are chosen to reproduce the experimental conditions.

The measured and calculated PES, obtained with XUV and NIR, exhibit sidebands originating from the interference between two quantum paths: the absorption of a harmonic and an NIR photon and the absorption of the next harmonic and the stimulated emission of an NIR photon (see Fig. 1A). Consequently, the amplitude of the sidebands, ASB, oscillates as a function of τ according to the formula (19)ASB=A+B cos[2ω0(τ−τXUV−τmol)](1)where A and B are two constants, ω0 is the angular frequency of the driving NIR field, τXUV denotes the group delay of the attosecond pulses (28), and τmol is the molecular two-photon ionization time delay (see the Supplementary Materials) (29). The combination of both high spectral and temporal resolution achieved in our experiment allows us to distinguish photoelectrons leaving the residual molecular cation in different vibrational states and to determine the variation in photoionization delays due to changes in the molecular geometry.

Figure 2 (A and B) shows the experimental and theoretical data, respectively, corresponding to the difference between the XUV + NIR and XUV-only PES (in color), which oscillates with frequency 2ω0 as a function of τ. Both theory and experiment are in excellent agreement (for details about the theoretical method, see the Supplementary Materials). Figure 2C presents the XUV-only (violet) and XUV + NIR (black) PES obtained by integrating over all delays. Good agreement with the calculated spectra shown in Fig. 2D can be noticed. The difference between theory and experiment in the relative intensities of some of the photoelectron peaks is due to the different position of the shape resonance predicted by theory (see Fig. 3B). In addition, the harmonic comb used in the theoretical calculations was slightly different from the experimental one. Figure 2E presents individual contributions from the X (blue) and A (red) states in the theoretical XUV + NIR PES, which allows us to assign the different features of the experimental spectra. The structures between 14.5 and 16 eV, for example, are due to ionization to the A state by absorption of the 21st harmonic leaving the N2+ ion in the v′ = 0 − 6 vibrational states and to a two-photon transition (sideband) to the X state with vibrational states v′ = 0,1 (blue shaded region). The small peaks near 14 eV are due to two-photon transitions to the A state with vibrational states v′ = 0,1 (red shaded region). Plotting the difference between the XUV + NIR and XUV-only PES allows us to confirm our assignment, since, as shown in Fig. 2A, we can distinguish between sideband (positive) and harmonic (negative) peaks.

Fig. 2 Photoelectron spectra.

Difference between PES obtained with XUV + NIR and XUV only, as a function of delay. Experiment (A) and theory (B). Experimental (C) and theoretical (D) PES for XUV-only (violet) and XUV + NIR (black) photoionization, averaged over all relative delays. (E) Theoretical PES for XUV + NIR photoionization to the X (blue) and A (red) electronic states. By comparing (A) and (E), we can assign the spectral features to different vibrational levels (shaded areas) of the X and A electronic states, as indicated by the vertical blue and red dashed lines, respectively.

Fig. 3 Photoionization time delays.

(A) Differences in molecular time delays (τmol) between X and A states for v′ = 0. Red circles, experiment; black circles, theory. (B) Partial photoionization cross sections for the X state; open squares, synchrotron-based experiment (30, 31); solid line, theory (this work). The position of the resonance maxima is shifted by almost 6 eV (denoted as ↔) between theory and experiment. This shift is also observed in the relative time delay (A and C). (C) Relative time delay between the vibrational levels v′ = 1 and 0 for the X state. The strong photon energy dependence observed here vanishes completely if one neglects the nuclear motion (see fig. S4). (D) Same as (C), but for the A state.

To determine molecular two-photon ionization time delays τmol, we fitted the measured (Fig. 2A) sideband oscillations to Eq. 1. The same procedure is applied to extract the theoretical ones from the RABBIT spectra computed with a time-dependent numerical approach. Figure 3 (A, C, and D) shows experimental (red circles) and theoretical (black circles) relative time delays for different final states. Since the contribution from the ionizing radiation (τXUV) is the same for all the final states of N2+, the plotted differences correspond to pure molecular contributions.

The relative molecular time delay for leaving N2+ in the X(v′ = 0) state with respect to leaving it in the A(v′ = 0) state is shown in Fig. 3A. For both theory and experiment, this relative delay varies by more than 40 as across the shape resonance region. The theoretical results, however, are shifted to lower energies with respect to the experimental ones by almost 6 eV, indicated by the green arrow in Fig. 3A, which is similar to the shift of the maximum of the calculated photoionization cross section in comparison with that obtained from synchrotron radiation measurements (see Fig. 3B) (30, 31). This is due to an incorrect description of the resonance position by our theoretical method, which is necessarily simpler than state-of-the-art electronic structure methods for the equilibrium geometry (32), as we must describe the molecular electronic continuum states in a wide range of internuclear distances, as well as all the continuum-continuum transitions induced by the NIR probe pulse (see the Supplementary Materials).

Figure 3 (C and D) shows the relative molecular time delays, τX(v′ = 1) − τX(v′ = 0) and τA(v′ = 1) − τA(v′ = 0), for the X and A electronic states, respectively. For the A state, the relative delay is very small and practically independent of photon energy, while for the X state, it varies markedly across the shape resonance. Once again, for the reasons described above, the theoretical curve is shifted down in energy with respect to the experimental one by ∼6 eV.

The variation of the molecular time delay differences between the X and A states observed in Fig. 3A is therefore mainly due to the variation of the time delay for the former, which can be attributed to the presence of the shape resonance. The time delay varies with energy because the time spent by the photoelectron in the metastable state before being ejected into the continuum also varies with energy. Since, for the A state, the electron does not have to go through any potential barrier, the corresponding time delay is much smaller than for the X state.

We now analyze the physical meaning of the results presented in Fig. 3 (C and D). In atomic systems, photoionization time delays obtained from RABBIT measurements can often be written as the sum of two contributions, τ1 + τcc. The first term is related to one-photon ionization by the XUV field. For a single or dominant ionization channel containing no sharp structures in the continuum (e.g., narrow Fano resonances), τ1 is given by the derivative of the scattering phase in that particular channel, the so-called Wigner delay (33, 34). The second term, τcc, is the additional time delay due to the continuum-continuum transitions induced by the NIR field (35, 36).

In the vicinity of the shape resonance, one-photon ionization leading to N2+ in the X state is dominated by the f-wave (𝓁 = 3). Similarly, for the A state, the d-wave (𝓁 = 2) dominates over all other partial waves in the same photon energy region (see fig.S2). Although the molecular two-photon ionization time delay τmol cannot be strictly decomposed as τ1 + τcc, due to averaging over molecular orientation and electron emission angle, the variation of τmol in Fig. 3 (C and D) still reflects the ionization dynamics arising from the main channels (29). Figure 4 shows the modulus and phase of the dominant terms contributing to the dipole transition element as a function of electron kinetic energy ε and internuclear distance R for both electronic states (see the Supplementary Materials for notations). For the X state, at a given ε, both the modulus (Fig. 4A) and phase (Fig. 4B) of the dipole transition element strongly vary with R within the Franck-Condon region, in contrast to the A state (Fig. 4, C and D). This implies that electronic transitions cannot be considered instantaneous relative to nuclear motion as assumed by the widely used Franck-Condon picture. Consequently, the molecular photoionization delays, obtained by taking the derivative of the phase of the dipole transition element, strongly depend on R. The difference in molecular time delays between the v′ = 1 and 0 vibrational levels thus provides direct information on non–Franck-Condon ionization dynamics, i.e., on how the nuclear motion affects the photoionization process.

Fig. 4 One-photon dipole transition matrix elements.

Modulus (A and C) and phase (B and D) of the dominant terms dσu,l=3,zX (A and B) and dδg,l=2,xA (C and D) contributing to the one-photon transition matrix element of the X and A states, respectively, as a function of the internuclear distance (R) and electron kinetic energy (ε). The area between the two dashed lines denotes the Franck-Condon region.

Figure 5A shows the absolute square of the product between the initial vibrational wave function, the transition matrix element for the X state (see Fig. 4A) at an electron kinetic energy of 8.2 eV, and the final vibrational wave function (see the Supplementary Materials for details). The initial and final vibrational wave functions correspond, respectively, to the v = 0 level of N2 in the ground electronic state and the v′ = 0 (black) and v′ = 1 (red) levels of N2+ in the X electronic state. These curves have well-defined maxima at R = 1.113 and 1.09 Å, respectively, showing that the transition to the shape resonance occurs, on average, at smaller internuclear distances for v′ = 1 than for v′ = 0. This small difference in bond length of ∼0.02 Å has a notable impact on the electron dynamics. As illustrated in Fig. 5B, the potential felt by the emitted photoelectron at these two internuclear distances is different, leading to a higher resonance energy for R = 1.09 Å (v′ = 1) than for R = 1.113 Å (v′ = 0), as seen by comparing the red and black dashed lines. In addition, because of the different slopes on the rising (left inset in Fig. 5B) and falling (right inset in Fig. 5B) edges, the barrier is narrower, and the resonance lifetime is shorter for v′ = 1 than for v′ = 0.

Fig. 5 Electron dynamics induced by structural changes.

(A) Absolute square of the transition matrix element dσu,l=3,zX at an electron kinetic energy of 8.2 eV, multiplied by the initial (χi;v = 0) and final (χf;v’) vibrational wave functions, Pv,v′, as a function of the internuclear distance R. The red and black curves correspond to transitions from the v = 0 level in the neutral ground state to the v′ = 1 and the v′ = 0 levels of the X state, respectively. (B) Potential felt by an electron escaping from an N2 molecule with internuclear distance Rv'=1 = 1.09 Å (red) and Rv'=0 = 1.113 Å (black), calculated at the same of level of theory as the dipole matrix elements. These Kohn-Sham potentials are shown along the internuclear axis, with the two wells representing the two N atoms. The origin is placed at the center of mass of the molecular ion. The dashed lines show the corresponding resonance energies. As shown in the insets, the barrier width depends on R, hence, on the vibrational state of the ion. Figure 5C shows the photoionization delays (τ1) as a function of photon energy obtained at the internuclear distances Rv'=1 = 1.09 Å (red) and Rv'=0 = 1.113 Å (black) and the relative delay between them, τ1X(Rv'=1)−τ1X(Rv'=0) (green). The resonance lifetimes (full circles) and widths (horizontal bar) calculated in the Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) approximation from the two potentials presented in Fig. 5B are also shown.

Figure 5C shows the photoionization delays resulting from the one-photon dipole transition matrix elements calculated at the two abovementioned internuclear distances as a function of photon energy. The difference in internuclear distance leads to a noticeable shift in the position of the corresponding maxima of photoionization delays, in agreement with the difference in resonance energy discussed above and the positions of the maxima calculated using the Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) approximation, indicated by the black and red dots. In addition, the energy range where the photoionization delays vary substantially is slightly broader for v′ = 1 than for v′ = 0, a direct consequence of the shorter lifetime for v′ = 1. This can also be seen by the horizontal bars, representing the widths of resonance obtained with the WKB approximation. Both effects, due to the shape resonance, contribute to a variation of the time delay difference between the v′ = 1 and v′ = 0 states as indicated by the green curve. Such a simple model predicts the main features of the experimental results in Fig. 3C, particularly the change of sign of the relative photoionization delay at low photon energy and the maximum at approximately the resonance position. It is worth noting that the resonance lifetimes obtained from the WKB model, 139.6 and 163 as for the v′ = 1 and v′ = 0 levels, respectively, are much smaller than the corresponding vibrational period, which is of the order of 16 fs (see the Supplementary Materials for details). As a consequence, the nuclei barely move during the ionization process, thus supporting the above analysis.

CONCLUSION

In summary, we measured vibrationally resolved molecular photoionization time delays between the X and A electronic states in N2 across the 3σg−1 shape resonance using attosecond interferometry. This enabled us to capture the changes associated with nuclear motion on the centrifugal barrier seen by the escaping photoelectron. The observation of such changes goes beyond the usual Franck-Condon approximation, which assumes that electronic transitions are instantaneous in comparison with nuclear motion. By combining attosecond time resolution with high spectral resolution, we were able to break the temporal frontier beyond which the signature of the “slow” nuclear motion in molecular photoionization can be seen and quantified. This approach should allow investigating the effect of nuclear motion on a variety of electronic processes in more complex molecular systems at the subfemtosecond time scale.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental methods

The output of a Ti:Sapphire laser system delivering NIR pulses around 800 nm with 5-mJ pulse energy at 1-kHz repetition rate was sent to an actively stabilized Mach-Zehnder–type interferometer. In the “pump” arm, the NIR pulses were focused into a gas cell containing argon atoms to produce a train of attosecond XUV pulses via high-order harmonic generation. A 200-nm-thick aluminum foil was used to filter out the copropagating NIR pulse. The bandwidth of the driving NIR pulse was kept around 50 nm, which ensured the generation of high-order harmonics having full width at half maximum of about 150 meV. This is notably smaller than the energy separation (267 meV) between the lowest vibrational levels (v′ = 1 and v′ = 0) of the X electronic state in N2+ (see the Supplementary Materials), which is essential to vibrationally resolve the measured PES. In the “probe” arm, the NIR pulses could be delayed relative to the XUV pulses by a piezoelectric-controlled delay stage and blocked at each alternate shot by a mechanical chopper. After recombination, the collinearly propagating XUV and NIR pulses were focused by a toroidal mirror into an effusive gas jet of N2. The emitted photoelectrons were detected by a 2-m-long magnetic bottle electron spectrometer, with a 4π solid angle collection. We estimated an average NIR intensity of 8 × 1011 W/cm2 in the interaction region.

Data analysis

Because of the spectral congestion between ionization by XUV and XUV + NIR radiation to the three different states (X, A, and B) of the N2+ ion (see fig. S1), a careful analysis of the experimental data was needed. Hence, a spectrally resolved variant of the RABBIT protocol, called Rainbow RABBIT (37), was used to analyze the experimental data. Despite the overlap between the X and B states, we could determine the phases of the sideband oscillations by carefully choosing the region with least possible spectral overlap. In addition, at relatively high photon energies (>25 eV), the photoionization cross section to the B state is much smaller than to the X state (29). Therefore, the measured time delays for the X state can be considered to be effectively free from any possible spectral contamination from the B state.

For every sideband, a Fourier transform was performed to make sure that the sideband oscillation did not include frequency components higher than 2ω0. The uncertainty σX (σA) for each measurement of the molecular photoionization time delay τX (τA) was obtained from the fit of the RABBIT oscillation to a cosine function (see Eq. 1). The corresponding uncertainty on the relative time delay, τX − τA, can be expressed asσX−A=σX2+σA2(2)

An identical procedure was used to calculate the uncertainties for the relative time delays between two vibrational levels of the same electronic state.

The final experimental values shown in Fig. 3 were obtained from a weighted average of the data points from several sets of measurements. For N measurements yielding N data points: k1, k2, …, kN with corresponding uncertainties: σ1, σ2, …, σN, the weighted average can be calculated ask¯=∑i=1Nwiki∑i=1Nwi(3)where wi=1/σi2 is the weight. The error bars indicated in Fig. 3 are the weighted standard deviation, defined asσk¯=N∑i=1Nwi(ki−k¯)2(N−1)∑i=1Nwi(4)

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary material for this article is available at http://advances.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/6/31/eaba7762/DC1

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.

REFERENCES AND NOTES

  1. ↵
    1. E. Fermi,
    2. E. Amaldi,
    3. O. D’Agostino,
    4. F. Rasetti,
    5. E. Segrè
    , Artificial radioactivity produced by neutron bombardment. Proc. R. Soc. A 146, 483–500 (1935).
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. N. Bohr
    , Neutron capture and nuclear constitution. Nature 137, 344–348 (1936).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    J. M. Blatt, V. F. Weisskopf, Theoretical Nuclear Physics (Springer-Verlag, New York Inc., 1979).
  4. ↵
    1. W. C. Stolte,
    2. D. L. Hansen,
    3. M. N. Piancastelli,
    4. I. Dominguez Lopez,
    5. A. Rizvi,
    6. O. Hemmers,
    7. H. Wang,
    8. A. S. Schlachter,
    9. M. S. Lubell,
    10. D. W. Lindle
    , Anionic photofragmentation of CO: A selective probe of core-level resonances. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4504–4507 (2001).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. C. M. Lovejoy,
    2. D. J. Nesbitt
    , Mode specific internal and direct rotational predissociation in HeHF, HeDF, and HeHCl: van der Waals complexes in the weak binding limit. J. Chem. Phys. 93, 5387–5407 (1990).
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. L. H. Andersen,
    2. P. Hvelplund,
    3. D. Kella,
    4. P. H. Mokler,
    5. H. B. Pedersen,
    6. H. T. Schmidt,
    7. L. Vejby-Christensen
    , Resonance structure in the electron-impact detachment cross section of C2− caused by the formation of C22−. J. Phys. B Atom. Mol. Opt. Phys. 29, L643–L649 (1996).
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. A. B. Henson,
    2. S. Gersten,
    3. Y. Shagam,
    4. J. Narevicius,
    5. E. Narevicius
    , Observation of resonances in Penning ionization reactions at sub-kelvin temperatures in merged beams. Science 338, 234–238 (2012).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. G. J. Schulz
    , Resonances in electron impact on atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 45, 378–422 (1973).
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. R. E. Palmer,
    2. P. J. Rous
    , Resonances in electron scattering by molecules on surfaces. Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 383–440 (1992).
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. J. L. Dehmer,
    2. D. Dill,
    3. S. Wallace
    , Shape-resonance-enhanced nuclear-motion effects in molecular photoionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1005–1008 (1979).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. M. N. Piancastelli
    , The neverending story of shape resonances. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 100, 167–190 (1999).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. F. Martin,
    2. P. D. Burrow,
    3. Z. Cai,
    4. P. Cloutier,
    5. D. Hunting,
    6. L. Sanche
    , DNA strand breaks induced by 0−4 eV electrons: The role of shape resonances. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 068101 (2004).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. X.-C. Yao,
    2. R. Qi,
    3. X.-P. Liu,
    4. X.-Q. Wang,
    5. Y.-X. Wang,
    6. Y.-P. Wu,
    7. H.-Z. Chen,
    8. P. Zhang,
    9. H. Zhai,
    10. Y.-A. Chen,
    11. J.-W. Pan
    , Degenerate Bose gases near a d-wave shape resonance. Nat. Phys. 15, 570–576 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. J. B. West,
    2. A. C. Parr,
    3. B. E. Cole,
    4. D. L. Ederer,
    5. R. Stockbauer,
    6. J. L. Dehmer
    , Shape-resonance-induced non-Franck-Condon vibrational intensities in 3σg photoionisation of N2. J. Phys. B Atom. Mol. Opt. Phys. 13, L105–L108 (1980).
    OpenUrl
    1. J. L. Dehmer
    , Shape resonances in molecular fields. ACS Symp. Ser. 263, 139–163 (1984).
    OpenUrl
    1. N. Haack,
    2. G. Ceballos,
    3. H. Wende,
    4. K. Baberschke,
    5. D. Arvanitis,
    6. A. L. Ankudinov,
    7. J. J. Rehr
    , Shape resonances of oriented molecules: Ab initio theory and experiment on hydrocarbon molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 614–617 (2000).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. E. Plésiat,
    2. S. E. Canton,
    3. J. D. Bozek,
    4. P. Decleva,
    5. F. Martín
    , Resonant photoelectron confinement in the SF6 molecule. J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 1062–1068 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. J. Adachi,
    2. K. Hosaka,
    3. S. Furuya,
    4. K. Soejima,
    5. M. Takahashi,
    6. A. Yagishita,
    7. S. K. Semenov,
    8. N. A. Cherepkov
    , Shape-resonance-enhanced vibrational effects in the angular distributions of C 1s photoelectrons from fixed-in-space CO molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 163001 (2003).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. P. M. Paul,
    2. E. S. Toma,
    3. P. Breger,
    4. G. Mullot,
    5. F. Augé,
    6. P. Balcou,
    7. H. G. Muller,
    8. P. Agostini
    , Observation of a train of attosecond pulses from high harmonic generation. Science 292, 1689–1692 (2001).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. K. Klünder,
    2. J. M. Dahlström,
    3. M. Gisselbrecht,
    4. T. Fordell,
    5. M. Swoboda,
    6. D. Guénot,
    7. P. Johnsson,
    8. J. Caillat,
    9. J. Mauritsson,
    10. A. Maquet,
    11. R. Taïeb,
    12. A. L’Huillier
    , Probing single-photon ionization on the attosecond time scale. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 143002 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. M. Isinger,
    2. R. J. Squibb,
    3. D. Busto,
    4. S. Zhong,
    5. A. Harth,
    6. D. Kroon,
    7. S. Nandi,
    8. C. L. Arnold,
    9. M. Miranda,
    10. J. M. Dahlström,
    11. E. Lindroth,
    12. R. Feifel,
    13. M. Gisselbrecht,
    14. A. L’Huillier
    , Photoemission in the time and frequency domain. Science 358, 893–896 (2017).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. S. Haessler,
    2. B. Fabre,
    3. J. Higuet,
    4. J. Caillat,
    5. T. Ruchon,
    6. P. Breger,
    7. B. Carré,
    8. E. Constant,
    9. A. Maquet,
    10. E. Mével,
    11. P. Salières,
    12. R. Taïeb,
    13. Y. Mairesse
    , Phase-resolved attosecond near-threshold photoionization of molecular nitrogen. Phys. Rev. A 80, 011404(R) (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. M. Huppert,
    2. I. Jordan,
    3. D. Baykusheva,
    4. A. von Conta,
    5. H. J. Wörner
    , Attosecond delays in molecular photoionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 093001 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. L. Cattaneo,
    2. J. Vos,
    3. R. Y. Bello,
    4. A. Palacios,
    5. S. Heuser,
    6. L. Pedrelli,
    7. M. Lucchini,
    8. C. Cirelli,
    9. F. Martín,
    10. U. Keller
    , Attosecond coupled electron and nuclear dynamics in dissociative ionization of H2. Nat. Phys. 14, 733–738 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. J. Vos,
    2. L. Cattaneo,
    3. S. Patchkovskii,
    4. T. Zimmermann,
    5. C. Cirelli,
    6. M. Lucchini,
    7. A. Kheifets,
    8. A. S. Landsman,
    9. U. Keller
    , Orientation-dependent stereo Wigner time delay and electron localization in a small molecule. Science 360, 1326–1330 (2018).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. P. Antoine,
    2. A. L’Huillier,
    3. M. Lewenstein
    , Attosecond pulse trains using high-order harmonics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1234–1237 (1996).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. E. Plésiat,
    2. M. Lara-Astiaso,
    3. P. Decleva,
    4. A. Palacios,
    5. F. Martín
    , Real-time imaging of ultrafast charge dynamics in tetrafluoromethane from attosecond pump-probe photoelectron spectroscopy. Chem. A Eur. J. 28, 12061–12070 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Y. Mairesse,
    2. A. de Bohan,
    3. L. J. Frasinski,
    4. H. Merdji,
    5. L. C. Dinu,
    6. P. Monchicourt,
    7. P. Breger,
    8. M. Kovačev,
    9. R. Taïeb,
    10. B. Carré,
    11. H. G. Muller,
    12. P. Agostini,
    13. P. Salières
    , Attosecond synchronization of high-harmonic soft X-rays. Science 302, 1540–1543 (2003).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. D. Baykusheva,
    2. H. J. Wörner
    , Theory of attosecond delays in molecular photoionization. J. Chem. Phys. 146, 124306 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. A. Hamnett,
    2. W. Stoll,
    3. C. E. Brion
    , Photoelectron branching ratios and partial ionization cross-sections for CO and N2 in the energy range 18–50 eV. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 8, 367–376 (1976).
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. E. W. Plummer,
    2. T. Gustafsson,
    3. W. Gudat,
    4. D. E. Eastman
    , Partial photoionization cross sections of N2 and CO using synchrotron radiation. Phys. Rev. A 15, 2339–2355 (1977).
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. E. Plésiat,
    2. P. Decleva,
    3. F. Martín
    , Vibrational branching ratios in the photoelectron spectra of N2 and CO: Interference and diffraction effects. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 10853–10871 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. E. P. Wigner
    , Lower limit for the energy derivative of the scattering phase shift. Phys. Rev. 98, 145–147 (1955).
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    1. F. T. Smith
    , Lifetime matrix in collision theory. Phys. Rev. 118, 349–356 (1960).
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. J. M. Dahlström,
    2. D. Guénot,
    3. K. Klünder,
    4. M. Gisselbrecht,
    5. J. Mauritsson,
    6. A. L’Huillier,
    7. A. Maquet,
    8. R. Taïeb
    , Theory of attosecond delays in laser-assisted photoionization. Chem. Phys. 414, 53–64 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. J. M. Dahlström,
    2. A. L’Huillier,
    3. A. Maquet
    , Introduction to attosecond delays in photoionization. J. Phys. B Atom. Mol. Opt. Phys. 45, 183001 (2012).
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. V. Gruson,
    2. L. Barreau,
    3. Á. Jiménez-Galan,
    4. F. Risoud,
    5. J. Caillat,
    6. A. Maquet,
    7. B. Carré,
    8. F. Lepetit,
    9. J.-F. Hergott,
    10. T. Ruchon,
    11. L. Argenti,
    12. R. Taïeb,
    13. F. Martín,
    14. P. Salières
    , Attosecond dynamics through a Fano resonance: Monitoring the birth of a photoelectron. Science 354, 734–738 (2016).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. L. S. Cederbaum
    , Born-Oppenheimer approximation and beyond for time-dependent electronic processes. J. Chem. Phys. 128, 124101 (2008).
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. M. Stener,
    2. D. Toffoli,
    3. G. Fronzoni,
    4. P. Decleva
    , Recent advances in molecular photoionization by density functional theory based approaches. Theor. Chem. Acc. 117, 943–956 (2006).
    OpenUrl
    1. H. J. Ludde,
    2. A. Macfas,
    3. F. Martín,
    4. A. Riera,
    5. J. L. Sanz
    , Inclusive cross sections in collisions of multicharged ions with dressed targets. J. Phys. B Atom. Mol. Opt. Phys. 28, 4101–4115 (1995).
    OpenUrl
    1. R. van Leeuwen,
    2. E. J. Baerends
    , Exchange-correlation potential with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys. Rev. A 49, 2421–2431 (1994).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. R. Pazourek,
    2. S. Nagele,
    3. J. Burgdörfer
    , Attosecond chronoscopy of photoemission. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 765–802 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Acknowledgments: S.N. acknowledges fruitful discussions with V. Loriot and F. Lépine. Calculations were performed at the CCC-UAM and the Marenostrum Supercomputer Center. Funding: We acknowledge the support from the ERC advanced grant PALP-339253, the Swedish Research Council (grant no. 2013-8185), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, and the European COST Action AttoChem (CA18222). E.P., A.P., and F.M. acknowledge the support of the MINECO project FIS2016-77889-R. F.M. acknowledges support from the “Severo Ochoa” Programme for Centres of Excellence in R&D (MINECO, grant SEV-2016-0686) and the “María de Maeztu” Programme for Units of Excellence in R&D (CEX2018-000805-M). A.P. acknowledges the support of a Ramón y Cajal contract (RYC-2014-16706) from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Spain). E.P. acknowledges the support of a Juan de la Cierva contract (IJCI-2015-26997) from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Spain). Author contributions: S.N. conceived the experiment, the planning for which was further improved by inputs from S.Z., A.L.H., and M.G. S.N., S.Z., D.B., M.I., L.N., and C.L.A. carried out the experiment. S.N. and S.Z. performed the data analysis. E.P. performed the theoretical calculations under the supervision of A.P., P.D., and F.M. The model was developed by E.P., A.P., and F.M. R.J.S. and R.F. provided the magnetic bottle electron spectrometer. M.G., A.L.H., and F.M. supervised the project. S.N., A.L.H., M.G., and F.M. wrote the manuscript with inputs from all the authors. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.
View Abstract
View this article with LENS

Article Tools

My saved folders

Stay Connected to Science Advances

Related Content

Similar Articles in:

Citing Articles in:

Navigate This Article