Science Advances

Supplementary Materials

This PDF file includes:

  • Fig. S1. Fe solubility (%) of aerosols collected during multiple field campaigns for the field data and the simulated estimates from models used in this study.
  • Fig. S2. Comparison of simulated estimates and observed values for total Fe concentration (ng m−3).
  • Fig. S3. Comparison of simulated estimates with combustion aerosols plus mineral dust and observed values for labile Fe concentration (ng m−3).
  • Fig. S4. Comparison of simulated estimates with mineral dust only and observed values for labile Fe concentration (ng m−3).
  • Fig. S5. Model estimates of Fe solubility in aerosols versus field data collected during multiple field campaigns (triangles for Arabian Sea and circles for others).
  • Fig. S6. Deposition fluxes of total Fe (ng Fe m−2 s−1) from dust and combustion sources to present-day oceans.
  • Fig. S7. Deposition fluxes of labile Fe (ng Fe m−2 s−1) from dust and combustion sources to present-day oceans.
  • Table S1. Summary of averaged Fe solubility in atmospheric models used in this study.
  • Table S2. Latitude, longitude, month, and Fe solubility (%) in aerosols for the intercomparison study.
  • Table S3. Comparison of Fe solubility (%) between the simulated estimates from models and field data.

Download PDF

Files in this Data Supplement: