Selection bias was addressed by propensity score analysis. Briefly, this is a two-phase technique used to estimate a treatment effect in comparative groups selected by nonrandom means. In the first phase of a propensity score analysis, variables that influence selection to group assignment are used to model the probability of receiving treatment (or of being in the reference group, in this case, the baricitinib group). The resulting probability is the propensity score. In the second phase, the propensity score is used to adjust for preexisting group differences in the analysis of the relevant outcomes. There are several ways to use propensity scores such as stratification variables, matching patients on the basis of their propensity score, or their use as a weighting or adjustment variable during multivariate analysis. In the current study, each baricitinib patient was matched to a control patient on the basis of comparable propensity scores. Assuming that all relevant covariates are included in the propensity score model, the group effect observed in a propensity score analysis represents an unbiased estimate of the true treatment effect.
HR (95% CI) | P | |
Baricitinib | 0.29 (0.15–0.58) | 0.0001 |
Age | 1.01 (0.98–1.04) | 0.470 |
Male sex | 1.13 (0.54–2.34) | 0.750 |
Hypertension | 1.31 (0.52–3.32) | 0.572 |
Diabetes | 0.51 (0.23–1.17) | 0.113 |
Chronic obstructive lung disease | 0.51 (0.17–1.54) | 0.230 |
Cardiovascular disease | 1.41 (0.68–2.92) | 0.351 |
Chronic kidney disease | 1.45 (0.51–4.15) | 0.491 |
Solid cancer | 1.18 (0.49–2.87) | 0.709 |
Charlson comorbidity index | 1.03 (0.90–1.17) | 0.680 |
Baseline PaO2/FiO2 | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | 0.823 |
Lymphocyte count (per μl) | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | 0.657 |
ALT | 1.01 (1.00–1.03) | 0.026 |
Hydroxychloroquine | 2.77 (0.28–27.41) | 0.384 |
Lopinavir/ritonavir | 1.18 (0.38–3.61) | 0.776 |
Glucocorticoids | 1.79 (0.60–5.34) | 0.299 |
LMWH | 0.10 (0.01–1.33) | 0.081 |
Antibiotics | 2.34 (0.29–18.90) | 0.427 |